• Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Humanity cannot and will not change its practices fast enough to avoid running out of resources we keep ourselves dependent on because it’s “profitable.” We are a doomed species and won’t be around for very much longer. We are likely living in the flash of bright before the long dark. I don’t think the world my grandchildren live in will be remotely like the one we have now.

    I’m perfectly fine hedging my bets and living life normally, but I think our longevity is an uncomfortable truth most people don’t want to face.

    • Iapar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about rust? Isn’t its goal to be a modern c? Not that this is my opinion just something i read.

      • 257m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rust is a better C++ replacement than C. Something like Odin would fit the mold better than Rust ever will.

        • Iapar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it because c/odin is even lower level or what is the difference in your opinion if you don’t mind explaining.

          I try to make sense of the whole programming world but it is just so complex and most of what is written is pretty dry so i like to ask people.

          • 257m@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Simplicity of design. Rust is built cleverly. It has lots of features and there are also tons of clever ways to solve a problem. Odin is quite simple and although not entirely minimalistic, it is written in a very clear way when approaching a problem. The borrow checker in rust in one thing I would call clever. It takes time to get used and although can be quite useful for safety it is too clever.

    • idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Aren’t ask lemmy posts “low effort” in general as well in the sense that it’s just a question? My point isn’t that ask lemmy is bad, my point is just because it’s low effort doesn’t mean it’s bad.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copyright is far too long and should only last at most 20 years.

    Actually, George Washington would agree with me if he was still alive. He and the other founding fathers created the notion of copyright, which was to last 14 years. Then big corporations changed the laws in their favor.

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hot extreme opinion: copyright shouldn’t exist, and authors should be covered by other means, particularly public funding based on usage numbers and donations.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The world got essentially all classical music, the painting on the ceiling of the Sistine chapel, etc. without the need for copyright. Shakespeare’s work wasn’t protected by copyrights either. So, it’s not like amazing works of art require copyright. They’ll happen regardless. It’s more about how artists are incentivized to create and who profits.

  • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who are unable to smoothly merge or use slip roads without slowing down 500m before even starting to turn off should have their licenses revoked unless they take a driving course to correct their behaviour.

    People who zigzag should just be put in a gulag however. Scum of the earth.

  • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People are crazy when they promote closed-source AI (okay, okay, generative model) projects like ChatGPT, Bard etc.

    This is literally one of the most important technologies of the future, and after all the times technology companies screwed them (us) up big time and monopolized the Internet, they go into the same trap again and again.

    First they surrendered the free Internet, now they surrender the new frontiers.

    Wake up, people. Go HuggingFace, advocate for free AI, and ideally - for a GPL one. We cannot afford for this part of our future to be taken away from us.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      99% (likely more even) of the people out there don’t have a clue what software is, or remotely how it works, what it does, and what open or closed software is, let alone why it’s important.

      Most people are seriously ignorant about these topics, so obviously everyone runs with closed source.

      All the open source gods are getting older, the eff founder has cancer… I don’t really see a next generation step up like the previous one and that one was already a miracle that it had gotten us this far. We’re screwed on the software front. Eh, humanity is screwed in so many ways anyway

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s true that majority is unaware and doesn’t care, which is sad.

        But we shouldn’t give up. There is plenty of youth going for freedom, and while we don’t yet have RMS of our generation, we will.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t use the current AI, specifically because it isn’t open source. Could I audit the code of an open source AI? Certainly not; it’s way over my head. However there would be an opportunity for experts to examine the source and report their findings. Currently? Black box, so no thanks.

      There are so many projects that could become possible through novel use of an open source AI (or whatever it should actually be called).

      Judging by the seemingly exponential improvements and integration, opinions such as ours are a grain of sand in Death Valley.

    • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pointedly avoid ChatGPT for that reason. When the NovelAI leak happened, it was amazing, and the open ecosystem flourished in response. I just can’t believe they call themselves OpenAi.

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, that name was left from when they’ve been open-source, which us why I advocate for the emergence of GPL-licensed projects.

        The open-source license for GPT model was very relaxed, which OpenAI took advantage of and, once it could afford their own programmer staff, closed the code with all the contributions all the programmers from all over the world have made.

        It’s an extremely dick move, and it was repeated by Google, too.

  • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People overlook vegetarianism and semi-vegetarian lifestyles as an option too much and it is not helpful that real life examples of vegetarian cultures, get co-opted by Vegans purists as “Vegan cultures” in easily disproven claims- thus hurting the whole movement

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t eat meat or dairy, so i technically i’m a vegan, right? But i wouldn’t identify as a vegan. When someone cooks and says: oh i forgot that you are vegan, and i used butter, still eat it. When i’m at a bbq and there is a steak leftover, and no one eats it and it goes to the trash, i would eat it. I find the idea of factory meat absolutely repulsive therefore i don’t support it in any way. Once i talked to a vegan guy, and he was super weird so we didn’t have a lot to talk about. I told him something like: when i was a kid i was really into chicken wings, and now in hindsight, i don’t think chicken is actually good. And he said: oh, you are one of THOSE people. Meat eater are like pedophiles, once you fucked a kid, you’ll always be a childfucker.

      Eh… Okay, i’ll just stand over there and make sure to never talk to you again

      • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        this is called flexitarianism and is totally valid in terms of not wasting food and cohabitating in society. unfortunately some vegetarians would bully a person like you since ideological purity is more important than not wasting food to them

    • s_s@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You absolutely can’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    • ThugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never been closer to vegan than I am now. And I love meat and animal products and have long given up on the illusion of any ethical consumption in capitalism. It just turns out meat is way overpriced and you can make some tasty meals for cheap without meat and most animal products.

      • I’m a vegetarian just because it’s the cheapest option. Meat is absurd in prices while going fully vegan, where I live, isn’t feasible either.

        So I live off a mostly vegetarian diet. It’s not even for ethical reasons. It’s literally a “I want to save money” motivation.

        • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty nuts what they’re asking for meat. I don’t do the major shopping in the family but last time I went to get some ground beef… holy sweet baby cheez wiz. I could swear it the price had doubled since the last time I looked (which was probably pre covid).

          There are so many great vegetarian recipes out there. Like, I mean, original things that were designed without meat in mind from the start not fake meat stuff like those vegetarian ribs I made one time. shudders

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be honest, I could see myself as a vegetarian. I can still eat eggs, have mayo, and most importantly, eat cheese. Also with vegans, they don’t just abstain from eating animals, they also abstain from consuming animal products, and using them in general meaning that not only are you giving up on eggs and cheese, but also leather boots and jackets etc. That’s too much. We are omnivores. Our ancestors survived on the scraps left by lions and other predators. Our only way to keep warm was leather skins. We could survive on berries and fungi, but we couldn’t keep warm with fire only. Anyways, I’m taking this a bit too far, but my point is, I’m supportive of vegetarians, but not of vegans.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had debates with vegans on something similar:
      I’m not vegan, I’ll never be vegan. That’s a complete non-starter for me.

      What I have done is reduce my meat intake from 2/sometimes 3 meals a day to 1 meal per day - occasionally (less than once per month) two. Once Lab-grown meat is a viable alternative on cost/taste/texture, I’ll be all over that. I still won’t be vegan. Even if I reach a point where no animals are harmed from my diet.

      I believe it is far easier to convince 1 Million people to do this than it would be to convert 100,000 people to full veganism. A Million people doing this would save Billions more animals per year than 100,000 vegan conversions and maybe even in itself convert a few of those people to full veganism along the way.

      They’re never interested. It’s all or nothing. Black or white. Vegan or Animal killer. They usually have issues with lab grown meat, as well.

      It’s as though they’re a member of an elite club and membership is more important than actually saving animals.

      • weastie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, most vegans would still commend your effort to reduce animal product consumption.

        But from a moral standpoint, simply eating less animal products really doesn’t have much value. Imagine using your argument for other moral dilemmas.

        “Racism is wrong, so I reduced the amount of racial slurs I use to only 1/3”
        “Rape is wrong, so I only rape on Mondays now” (in reference to meatless Mondays)

        I hate to be so militant about it, but you either think animal abuse is acceptable or you don’t.

        Now, what I do think could be a moral standpoint, if you really want to still be able to eat meat, is to only eat “humane” meat. I put “humane” in quotes because even farmers with the best intentions are still killing animals young. I don’t personally believe any animal product can be humane, but even then I can recognize that any animal that was raised on a pasture and ate real food is more ethical to eat than one in a factory.

        So if you genuinely only ate pasture raised beef and chicken (and you were sure about it), then I would say that is quite honorable.

        • Nath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But from a moral standpoint, simply eating less animal products really doesn’t have much value. Imagine using your argument for other moral dilemmas.

          Ahh yeah about that: My reasons are not what you’re calling “moral”. We are naturally omnivores. We’ve been omnivorous since before we came down from the trees. Probably since before we left the water. I don’t have a problem eating meat. I think a vegan diet is unnatural for us, though I have no issues with anyone who chooses that lifestyle.

          My reasons are from a sustainability/environmental position. Our present consumption levels already put a strain on the planet, and we sure couldn’t sustain it if everyone on the planet ate meat three meaty meals a day. This is another reason I’m all about that lab grown meat.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That capitalism is not the cause of most societal grief. Pathological self preservation is a fundamental human problem. It’s the reason we’re okay with seeing hordes of homeless people, or with killing people to resolve geopolitical issues. Greed can optimize any system to work for itself, people who are or will be adept at such optimization would thrive under any kind of socioeconomic or cultural system, including extremely leftist systems. Just spit ballin’ tho, haven’t thought about it much tbh.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TikTok and YouTube shorts are brain-rotting garbage, and if you use them regularly you need to stop now. Yes, even if you claim you only watch educational stuff.

    Also giving a child under the age of 8 or 9 a personal internet-connected device should be seen on a similar level as neglect if not full-on abuse.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fractional measurements are better than decimal measurements for anything where the level of precision is important.

    Decimal measurements can only increase our decrease in precision by a factor of 10.

    For example if your precision is accurate to 1/4 of a unit, you can represent that with fractions no problem.

    What is that in decimal? “0.25” implies precision to the hundredth of a unit.

    What if your measurement is half a unit, but it’s precise to 1/64 of a unit? Just don’t reduce the fractions. “32/64ths” is more precise than .5.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those math questions that rely on purposeful ambiguity in order to drive engagement are annoying as fuck. It’s like “congratulations, you just proved that in math (and questions in general) if you’re not clear with what you’re asking, people will get different answers”. What fantastic value! What a novel hypothesis! Now fucking knock it off. I’m tired of literally everyone screaming about how their way is right when it doesn’t fucking matter, the question was asked in a bullshit way in order to piss everyone off.

    Bonus, PEMDAS, BEMDAS, PE-MD-AS. It’s a goddamn terrible mnemonic that twists itself in knots to make the acronym work, rather than to make the order of operations clear. Screaming it doesn’t make your shit any clearer anyways.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Join me in RPN land, where we sit by looking smug while people thought different systems of infix notation debate the right answer.

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they weren’t ambiguous, then you wouldn’t see them getting popular. The difference of opinion drives engagement which means it’s more likely to show in your feed because that’s how most social media algorithms work.

      Things that everyone agrees on don’t get engagement, so they don’t bubble up to the top.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Three are also tests where you are expected to think like the person who made the test to figure or what the “correct” answer us. It’s not really correct, but it is the one that gets you the points.

      Also some IQ question have several correct answers, but only one of them gives you the points. Super annoying. If you’re creative and smart enough to come up with a logically consistent answer you’re still not guaranteed to get the “correct” answer.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you actually want to do some about climate change, step 1 is to stop having kids.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s something about American politics to provoke a lot of people, especially on this site:

    Donald Trump should be elected in 2024 purely to serve as an exam to the left. Liberalism clearly doesn’t work anymore, there’s a lot of discontent in the world and a shift towards far-right politics, while left is almost non-existent in almost any country, it doesn’t have an answer. With Donald Trump getting elected for his revenge term and demolishing democracy, hopefully it’s a catastrophe strong enough for the left to wake up.