Alternative reasons (not mutually exclusive):
Again, complex changes are obviously going to take more time, but if the simplest changes take significant time or effort then something is wrong.
More likely beets.
I helped do the easy scenario at large scale in a fortune 50 several years ago after the vendor thought they could get greedy on the support contract renewal. Only required small changes to a few files and packages.
Talos Linux is another unique option.
For most people, using https and dns over https (DoH) is probably all that’s needed.
Isn’t that because Dan hasn’t open-sourced his project yet
Wrong: https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed/blob/dev/LICENSE
and doesn’t let anybody else contribute?
Hmm, while there have been 158 contributors, a very small percent were from the other developers: https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed/graphs/contributors
This information is pretty easy to look up.
Right? So much of this seems like people not able to tell if actions are good or bad independent of who takes the action. There’s no way their team could ever do anything bad, and anything done by the other team is automatically bad.
God forbid you try to reinforce a rare good behavior from someone who’s also done a lot of horrendous things.
Is there betting (such as buy-in / ante) in Balatro?
Is there in MtG?
Agreed, gambling doesn’t have to be for money or even anything tangibly real.
Generalizations that are oversimplified to the point of lacking all nuance are probably untrue because there are bound to be exceptions. Instead, try including ‘many’, ‘most’, or such as an easy remedy.
Specifically, landlords can create value when they handle property management and maintenance (and the related costs) efficiently. It is wrong that greed has made that so rare.
There is no real need to use captured products though, so OP’s question is flawed.
Any desire to use said products (or not) needs to weigh the pros and cons of the captured products vs alternatives.
How many cops has she arrested or ticketed? This is a foundational component of the calculation.
One way would be by implementing features the Lemmy devs have no interest in such as better interoperability with other fediverse platforms. If any added feature turns out to be well received and in demand, it would pressure the others to implement similar.
How does that work since lactose isn’t a protein? Is it just that the affected people assumed they were intolerant of lactose, but it was actually the protein?