• 0 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年10月13日

help-circle

  • SONY funds, produces, distributes and collects 95% of the profit from all of the solo Tom Holland movies. While Marvel has total creative control over what actually happens in those movies. SONY decided to allow that situation to happen because it’s mutually beneficial to both companies. That contract ended after “No Way Home” and SONY had the option to make as many live action Spider-Man movies as they liked but, decided to extend their agreement with Marvel.

    Initially you didn’t specify “live action” so the “spider-verse” movies where a legit answer 🤷🏻 lol. The way you worded it saying that SONY “can’t” was a bit confusing/misleading though. I kind of get what your saying but also disagree because of the reasons mentioned above.












  • Not being held legally liable ≠ Nothing happened

    Afaik the report that was done was not made public. If one side paid for the investigation and controls all the info in said investigation then it can’t be used as proof of innocence.

    The firm also has its own reputation to consider, and wouldn’t let a client get away with materially misrepresenting their results.

    Meaning what? What would the company doing the investigation do is if the claims that someone said:

    I was asked about my sexual history, my boyfriends sexual history, “how I liked to fuck”.

    I was asked to twerk for a co-worker at one point.

    I was told I was chunky, fat, ugly, stupid. I was called “retarded” I was called a "removed

    Where true? How would one even prove that actually happened to them? The Investigation Company surely signed an NDA and had no legal ability to release any info found in says investigation right? If they started releasing info that accusations where in fact true they would lose all their business immediately right?



  • A former LTT employee made claims of sexual harassment and poor working environment. LTT paid a third party to investigate those claims and unsurprisingly didn’t find evidence that supported those claims. A lot of LTT stans use this as “evidence” that the accuser was lying. Assuming that is clearly false logic, investigating yourself isn’t proof of innocence.