• 1 Post
  • 627 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle


  • Well, I can’t claim to be an expert on the subject, at any rate, but there are plenty of models which are local-only and are required to directly reference the information they interpret. I’d assume a HIPAA-compliant model would need to be more like an airgapped NotebookLM than ChatGPT.

    But I would also assume the risk of hallucinations or misinterpretations is the reason why a clinician would still need to review the AI summary to add/correct details before signing off on everything, so there’s probably still some risk. Whether that risk of error is greater or less than an overworked resident writing their notes a couple days after finishing a 12-hour shift is another question, though.


  • The history is all there, the chart should contain each granular instance of what is done in exacting detail. The summary is just one of those obligatory elements of patient interactions covering the key details of a visit because no one has time to review each and every data value in the chart when looking through medical history.

    That aspect is not even a new AI thing to justify AI, that’s just how it works today. Each doctor or nurse who works with a patient for a given visit puts in a little paragraph or two summary of everything they did and their plans for future care, and maybe they also import some of the key data points they consider directly relevant. And while I think this shouldn’t be the case, a lot of this can happen hours or even days after that visit is over.

    A lot of that work can be streamlined or even made more accurate using an LLM where the only data set referenced is the data that exists in the chart. Not hallucinatory ChatGPT garbage, but something more airgapped and tailored to that specific purpose.




  • Stovetop@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldMarathon is delayed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Part of the confusion is that there was a different Prey game being worked on a couple years earlier that actually was connected to Prey 2006, but that project was canceled and the studio working on it closed.

    Given the quick turnaround between Prey 2 being canceled and Prey 2017 launching, I have to assume that Bethesda just took a separate project that Arkane was working on and slapped the “Prey” name on it to try to save face and show that the IP was still alive and well after the sequel was canceled.






  • I remember during the initial console reveal, basically the only thing they had to say was that the sticks are larger and smoother (in motion, not the caps themselves).

    I don’t know if they mentioned much else later, but they were very tacit about their durability/longevity. I don’t have much hope that things will be better, at any rate. I still bought a Switch 2, because I know it will still bring me joy to play, but as much as I enjoyed the comfort of playing with a Joycon in each hand, I’ve learned from the original Switch to avoid using the Joycons where possible and opt for a separate controller when playing docked (I’m just using the Pro Controllers I have left over from my original Switch).


  • Seems like the sort of thing that might be used to set up like a mobile command station or something. If a disaster occurs and some agency/organization needs to stand up operations at a new location immediately, things like that

    Definitely highly situational, but I’m sure some organizations out there are willing to pay a pretty penny for convenience during those types of situations.






  • They’re thick in the “ads bring us more money than making improvements” phase of corporate bullshit now.

    Reddit still can’t make a better app than the ones made by solo developers who just did it as a passion project, but they’ve got enough money to throw around for a Superbowl ad spot and an entire ad campaign on YouTube.