Lanky_Pomegranate530 to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoNightmare on Lemmy Street (A Fediverse GDPR Horror Story) - Michael Altfield's Tech Blogtech.michaelaltfield.netmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down110cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfediverse@lemmy.ml
arrow-up196arrow-down1external-linkNightmare on Lemmy Street (A Fediverse GDPR Horror Story) - Michael Altfield's Tech Blogtech.michaelaltfield.netLanky_Pomegranate530 to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square60fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfediverse@lemmy.ml
minus-square@woelkchen@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months ago a check every month enough to pay their full time salaries I would usually agree because often FOSS projects are used commercially but I don’t think this standard doesn’t apply here because the Lemmy instances are also non-commercial projects.
minus-square@rglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglish2•9 months ago Lemmy instances are also non-commercial projects. So why should they be expecting commercial-level support?
minus-square@woelkchen@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•9 months ago So why should they be expecting commercial-level support? “Users should be able to delete stuff they uploaded” is only something for commercial services?
minus-square@woelkchen@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months ago “You get what you pay for” “Open source respects your privacy! Lolnope, jk!”
I would usually agree because often FOSS projects are used commercially but I don’t think this standard doesn’t apply here because the Lemmy instances are also non-commercial projects.
So why should they be expecting commercial-level support?
“Users should be able to delete stuff they uploaded” is only something for commercial services?
“You get what you pay for”.
“Open source respects your privacy! Lolnope, jk!”