• spiderwort@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jeez, soapbox much?

    Yes, I think that a sane, self-aware, scientifically-rigorous system would choose public health over that bad stuff you mentioned.

    Like The Federation in Star Trek.

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Star Trek has an economic system, it’s not run “on science.” Star Trek is functionally fully automated luxury communism. Under capitalism we have the technology to have no scarcity, but that’s not profitable, so capitalists create scarcity by destroying excess product and not giving it to those in need. In Star Trek they have a duplicator thing so no one is in need and no one can make a profit. It is a communist utopia. If you want to see a rational society that implements policy for scientifically planned good look at China. Their ultimate goal is communism, but today for now their achievements include lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, heavily subsidizing green technology allowing it to be cheap and accessible, and lifting people’s living standards so that the life expectancy is higher the wealthy western countries.

      • spiderwort@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But does it have a voting system?

        Because I don’t recall seeing any voting booths in the Enterprise.

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why do you care? Star Trek is fictional, but socialism is real and democratic, moving toward communism (like Star Trek).