I am trying to choose between buying a Nintendo Switch or a Nintendo DS.

This may not be the perfect community to ask - but I can’t think of any better place.

The reason for my question: I don’t want to own obsolete hardware in 10 years. Lately most games seem to depend on a “phone home” feature, which is not really an issue for my pc because it is always connected, but a console is something I want to play always and everywhere.

I already did some searching and found that games can be played offline fine (most of them, some exceptions are there like Multiplayer and Mortal Kombat), but:

  • There is something like the paid Nintendo Online Account. I am not planning on having a paid account. How much of the system depends on the account?
  • Can I have progression in a game (let’s say: one of the Zelda franchise) and will my Wife and Kids all have their own progression, without having to pay for X accounts?
  • People who own a Switch, let’s take this to extremes, do you feel like in 20 years from now you can still do the same things on your hardware as you can do now? (No multiplayer is fine)

Also, feel free to rant about “paying is not owning”, the state of the gaming industry is horrible.

edit: Thank you all for the comments! I don’t post a lot, so it was kinda overwhelming :)

For clarity:

  • I meant I want to “buy for life” (not really “life”, but, if the hardware survives you can play on pre-internet consoles forever - you can even buy more games if you can find them)
  • I want to buy a physical copy of the games, not download them

I’ve decided to go with the Nintendo DS for now (I have a DSi - this week I bought a couple of games, 2nd hand). Reasons:

  • I already had it
  • Joycons on switch. Multiple people mentioned having problems with them. I don’t count on being able to buy them new in 10 years, meaning they will have to last.

Again: thank you all for the useful input!

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      The battery is a notable exemption from this (as is the display), which is also the most likely to fail multiple times over a span of 20 years. It’s certainly doable, just not as simple as swapping out the thumb sticks for example.

      • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Isn‘t the battery simply mounted with sticky tape and thanks to the case being screwed in still fessibly replaceable by the user?

        • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Check this iFixit guide: https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Steam+Deck+Battery+Replacement/149070

          It’s listed as “Difficult” and “2-4 hours”.

          In comparison, the iPhone 15 Pro battery replacement guide is listed as “Moderate” and “1-2 hours”.

          One of the problems with the Deck’s battery is that it’s glued in place so well you have to heat up the adhesive, and applying heat close to a battery is something you have to be quite careful about.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          sticky tape is the bane of battery repair.

          you gotta destroy it to remove it sometimes.

          • mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Acetone and/or floss (“sawing” through the glue under the battery). That’s how iFixIt instructed to remove a battery from a 2016 MacBook Pro that was also fixated using nasty sticky tape.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              thats a great tip, but some manufacturers have the battery on a recessed chassis, making this technique way more difficult to use.