I’m not a true mechanical keyboard enthusiast. I mean I like a good keyboard for typing code, so I rolled with model-Ms in the 80s and 90s, then some expensive Cherry keyboard I only recently retired because it was utterly spent (and it was PS/2), and now I happily use a Wooting Two HE.

I’m so glad the mechanical gaming keyboard scene has developed so much: it means there’s a plethora of really excellent keyboards for the rest of us who don’t play games.

But something utterly baffles me: why are high-quality keyboards getting smaller?

There’s a lot more keyboards without the numpad and the block of middle keys - whatever they’re called - or with the middle keys reduced or squashed up awkwardly on the side, than full-size plain old 102- or 104-key layout keyboards. What’s wrong with the numpad? Isn’t more keys generally better?

Back in the days, I bought the original Happy Hacking keyboard because it kind of made sense to maneuver around in our server room with a small keyboard that took up less space. Typing on it drove me up the wall but it was convenient to carry. And I guess it was also good option for going to LAN parties with a smaller backpack. But other than that, for a keyboard that never leaves your desk, I don’t get it.

Are there other advantages to smaller keyboards? Genuine question! I’m not dumping on smaller keyboards: to each his own and if you’re happy with yours, more power to you. I’d just like to know why you prefer smaller.

  • Metafalls_ (any)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago
    • QMK (rather, “easily” accessible keyboard firmware creator) makes keyboard less and less reliant on having a dedicated button for all of the functionalities provided by full size.
    • No need to move out of homerow is super nice, especially if you dont need to use your mouse frequetly.
    • its nice
  • randomperson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Smaller keyboards:

    • Encourage you to move your hands less. Part of this is allowing your mouse to be closer, especially if you’re right handed.
    • Aesthetically look cleaner and less cluttered
    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Point 2 is absolutely subjective, though. Personally, I think a full size or TKL look a lot better than a compact. It’s too distracting seeing something “missing” from a traditional setup. Though, I also like to have my keyboard and mouse a good distance from each other and spread out, rather than close and centered in front of me.

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is it for me, I basically don’t use those keys daily and can access them via a function key when I rarely need them, so I’m gonna prioritise the aesthetics and compactness.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        For me, having the symbols I use in a function layer is better than having them spread around, because I don’t have to move my hands as much.

  • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like having more real estate for the mouse. If I need the numpad, I just reach for it.

    I can live without the nav cluster. I can just Fn+arrows for pgup/dn/home/end. But can’t live without arrows.

    Size comparison

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like having more real estate for the mouse

      It seems many people who answered here also want a smaller keyboard to position the mouse closer to the centerline, or make room for the mouse.

      Perhaps I should mention my own setup then: I don’t use a mouse 🙂 I use this - rather confusingly named - fabulous trackball: the Kensington Expert Mouse:

      This is the best trackball ever. It’s been around for many years. People who like trackballs swear by it, and I can’t do without it.

      The trackball is right up against the keyboard. So even though I use a full-size 104-key keyboard, the “mouse” is ergonomically placed and doesn’t require a lot of space.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        How does a trackball hold up when playing vidya that requires a mouse normally? RTS, ARPG, Indie Rogue lites, FPS, basically anything that may require twitch, precision and traversal.

        • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Well, I’m not much of a gamer. But I regularly play Quake1, 2 and 3/Arena - which are traditional WASD + mouse games despite being old, and I have zero trouble aiming quickly and accurately, even far targets that are single-pixels. The Kensington has a big ball that really helps for fine control.

          Of course, there’s a learning curve, as with all trackballs. But once your favorite trackball becomes second nature, the (small) effort really pays off. I’ve used trackballs almost exclusively for 30 years and I’ve settled on the good old classic Kensington Expert Mouse, that’s a beloved favorite of musicians who lack desk real-estate in their MIDI setup, server room warriors like me, and just about anybody who wants a precise mouse without having to sacrifice space. Also, there is something to be said for always having the same controls at the same place all the time when you need to move the cursor: that too reduces hand fatigue.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            What a coincidence. I just dusted off my quakeworld client yesterday. How does performing an unscripted RJ with a trackball compare to a mouse?

            I’ve seen people swear by the ploopy. Have you had your hand on one?

            • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              How does performing an unscripted RJ with a trackball compare to a mouse?

              I just tried it again in case there was some difficulty but no: it’s just fine. The thing is, this trackball is exaclty as comfortable and efficient to me as your mouse is to you. So really there never is any difference in terms of usability. You’ll never catch me being slower or less precise with that thing, because I’ve been rolling with one Kensington Expert Mouse or another since the late 90s 🙁

              I’ve seen people swear by the ploopy. Have you had your hand on one?

              I have not. Like I said, I’ve been totally satisfied with the Expert Mouse for decades, so I’ve never had any need to change.

              But I did look it up and I can tell you rightaway what will drive you up the wall: it doesn’t have a scroll wheel. The Expert Mouse does (it’s a ring around the ball) and I don’t think I could live without it. Other than that, it sure looks interesting. I do like the open design.

              EDIT: Actually nevermind: I see it has some button to use the ball as a scrollwheel. Interesting… I might just order one.

  • radix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I liked having less space between my hands (left hand on the keyboard, right hand on the mouse). I also rarely use the numpad and other keys, so the negligible sacrifice was worth it for better ergonomics.

  • papabobolious@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t know but I feel the same. My main gripe is with media keys, because I don’t want Fn key combinations, but dedicated media buttons, which is increasingly rare. The most appealing keyboard I have laid eyes on recently is Das Keyboard which has a volume wheel, media keys and is full size, but it’s very pricey and not perfect still.

  • pedestrian@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have a 40% ortholinear kb because it’s more ergonomic. My fingers are never have to travel more than 2 keys away from home row. There are enough built in layers that I never feel like I’m missing a key. All keys are remappable. Beyond that I think it looks neat - folks always ask about it when they see it. When using a mouse and keyboard, my arms are kept at a reasonable distance apart (overall hands are closer together), so I can work or game longer without feeling like my shoulders or back are strained.

  • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m one of those weirdos who actually really likes using a smaller keyboard so I’ll give you a few reasons I like smaller keyboard and a few why I don’t like larger ones.

    First of all, desk space. I have a very small desk so not having the numpad makes for a lot more space for my mouse.

    I also find when gaming that my arms fall at a weird and uncomfortable angle when I have the keyboard and mouse at a comfortable distance apart.

    I don’t tend to use the numpad, or 9 key cluster above the arrow keys very often so the ones I do use (delete, Pg up and Pg down) are just mapped to a new layer. My board is ortholinear so I’ve also got the numpad mapped to a layer if I ever want to use it.

    The function row is also re-mapped over the number row with the - and + acting as 11 and 12 because I very rarely need to use a function key and a number key at the same time or in quick succession so theres no need for the seperate keys.

    I don’t program much but when I do, I’ve got all the relevant symbols labelled with their layers on the front of the cap so they’re not hard to find when I need them.

    I’m also very much not a tidy desk person and I do a lot of my hobby work at my desk so having a nice small keyboard I can cram wherever I can when I need it and just move out of the way when I don’t means I’m not always shuffling stuff around my desk to make space for this huge keyboard.

    Overall however, I just really like the look of a nice, small, compact keyboard with everything I need just there. It’s visually nice to have a uniform block of keys with no gaps, no larger or differently shaped keys, and that’s just not something a larger keyboard offers me.

    I can absolutely see how this sort of thing doesn’t work for most people because there is an element of having to re-learn muscle memory and such, but for most people that have tried it, they seem to find that when it works, it works very well!

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t get it either, but I also with with AS400s daily and therefore need f1-24 and I’m not going to deal with all the layering setup needed for that when I can get a normal keyboard and hit shift+F4 for F16 instead of shift+left ctrl+F4. It doesn’t seem like much but when you’re using F13-24 a lot then it gets annoying.

    I also want numpad, I don’t want to type IP schemes on the number row

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hoo boy. This is an issue close to my heart about which I could talk for an unreasonable length of time.

    I’m an accountant. Yes, spreadsheets. I always thought I you’d have to pry my numpad from my cold dead hands.

    About 6 months ago I bought one of the saucy little mech boards of which you speak. A keychron k6. It was a whimsical purchase. It would make my thinkpad set up look better when I posted pictures to /r/thinkpad.

    Turns out, I love using it so much that I can do without a numpad.

    The core element to answer your “why not full size” question is simply that this little harlot fits in my backpack, where a 100% board would not.

    Anyhow, I have a d-pad, and 2x function keys that can modify any key to whatever you want. So I don’t miss having any of the extra special keys. It took surprisingly little time to get used to.

    On occasion, I do have to grind through entering a list of numbers, but it’s really not that often and doesn’t take that much extra time.

    • axo10tl@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I do have to grind through entering a list of numbers

      Have you considered a numpad layer? They’re great. All of the speed and convenience with none of the wasted space or extra arm movements.

      I have a numpad for both hands on my Redox :-)

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve recently built and am transitioning to a 50-key split-ergo keyboard. I code for a living so, a bit of getting used to, to be honest. The big advantage is in ergonomics and portability. Fewer keys means that fingers have less travel distance.

  • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gamers generally want more room on the desk so their mice can travel further without needing to be repositioned.

    I love having a numpad for extra keybinds in MMOs and for number inputs for work, but I’ve since switched to a TKL and never looked back.

    I still miss the numpad but that thing can be bought separately, and not smashing my mouse into my keyboard is a big plus.

    Looking into upgrading to a Wooting 80HE once that launches; it’s like a TKL that wants to be questionably special, but given Wooting’s reputation I’d wager it’d still be better than anything else on the market.

  • mayooooo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    A mystery for me, the numpad is essential and at least 60 percent of the nav cluster is in constant use. And I prefer the full keyboard look

    • Kir@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The numpad Is essential or completely useless based on the PC usecase

        • Kir@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well of course no! Why should they, honestly! Do you really think a spreadsheet is a daily tool for the average person?

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I didn’t say “daily” . If the number pad is there, you can always just… not use it. The opposite doesn’t exactly work.

            • toastal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Imagine you had to swim thru your bathtub to use the toilet every night. Sure it’s nice when you need to bathe, but more often you’re just going to want to skip over it to the thing you do more often—taking a leak. Rather than design your bathroom unergonomically, inconveniently, rearrange it to make more sense. You can buy separate numpads & place it somewhere else on your desk for when you need it, but keep the mouse closer to your keyboard.

    • Metafalls_ (any)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Chances are: they are there on smaller keyboards too. It might not be in the usual spot while also hidden behind a layer but its there.

      This used to be a showstopper back when most of the available keyboards are not fully customizable firmware-wise. With the advent of QMK and VIA(L) on a lot of readily available keyboards, however, you can pretty much put any functionalities anywhere on any layer(s) you see fit.

      • mayooooo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The layer thing is really impressive, I’d actually love to have it on my normal huge keyboard. But I need the numpad available on the first layer, using a mouse is a must in my work

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I ditched my numpad when I set up a layer that puts 456 right under jkl. My left hand hits the layer key (how much do you use both your left and right hands while using a numpad) so it’s right there and I don’t even have to move my hand. Doing so let’s me have the essential mouse closer to the boards.

          It’s a full numpad, I’ve got the keys setup around it to put + - enter, etc there.

          I’ll also add though, it’s an ortholinear so it’s also the same grid layout and a normal numpad.

            • thejml@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              The numpad usage was super quick, but my first (I’ve got a few and all follow that pattern) was a tented, split, ortho keyboard, the Iris. The ortho part for normal typing took me about two weeks or so to get up to normal speed. The split part has definitely helped my RSI though.

              I definitely have tweaked my keymap for other special keys and media usage and such along the way. I’ve got the movement arrow keys under my sdf keys (for left, down, right, up on e) as well as of up and down on w&r so that hand doesn’t have to move either. Been living the ortho split life for 6 years now and I can easily type all day at work without any issues. (I’m a DevOps engineer so I do lots of typing, coding, console work all day long)

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    70% is the happiest middle ground for me: still have function row so less modifier-holding required (vertical space was never the issue) & tighter than tenkeyless while not giving up keys. Luckily these are readily sold & the default laptop keyboard setup. Numpads IMO are a niche peripheral that are rarely used & add stress to mouse usage since that numpad has to be crossed over every time for the average user; separate numpads can be bought and located somewhere more ergonomic.

  • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It is because mech keyboards are really expensive and people sacrifice size for affordability. That’s one of the main reasons anyway. Also you can then buy a numpad separately, I like a separate numpad.

  • Dhrystone@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Numpad not needed since already have number keys above the alphas (and you can buy separate tenkey pads if they’re really needed). The extra space on desktop gained by a shorter keyboard is far more useful. All of mine except two are TKL, the others are 60%. Below that you fall into specialist territory and having typed on QWERTY layouts with function keys for decades I think I’m a bit too old to unlearn and relearn typing, but some people find it fun to use weird and wonderful ortho, dactyl or 40% keebs with multiple programmable “layers”.