Custoslibera@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWishing you guys a happy civil war 2lemmy.worldimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageWishing you guys a happy civil war 2lemmy.worldCustoslibera@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareThe_Vampire@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThat’s not how American courts work? The upper court can find issue with practically anything it likes.
minus-squareReddfugee42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year ago That’s not how American courts work? Nope. The court of appeals can find fault with the methods, procedure, precedent etc but not the facts. (Also, that’s not how question marks work.)
minus-squareThe_Vampire@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoBut here’s the thing: they could easily say the method that led to the finding is wrong. It’s not a fact.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf it’s decided by the lower court it is held as fact. It may not in your opinion be correct but it is verifiably a fact at this point.
That’s not how American courts work? The upper court can find issue with practically anything it likes.
Nope. The court of appeals can find fault with the methods, procedure, precedent etc but not the facts.
(Also, that’s not how question marks work.)
But here’s the thing: they could easily say the method that led to the finding is wrong. It’s not a fact.
If it’s decided by the lower court it is held as fact. It may not in your opinion be correct but it is verifiably a fact at this point.