Hello! I’ve been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I’ve picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here’s the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the “free speech” alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What’s wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I’ll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that’s like kicking the hornet’s nest, so you don’t need to start in with “that’s a bad idea” I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    People telling you you’re and arsehole and treating you like what arsehole is then expressing their freedom of speech.

    It’s also a consequence of your speech.

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s fair but I don’t think there’s much freedom of speech if someone will murder you for what you’ve said

        • moreeni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s a possible outcome that I subconciously included in the list of consequences

            • moreeni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              No reason? Being murdered is still a consequence, isn’t it? Why wouldn’t I include it?

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Because “a consequence” doesn’t mean “any and every possible consequence anyone could think up”.

                • moreeni@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  So a consequence isn’t a term to describe consequences, according to you. OK, I seem to get it now.