On Sunday’s I add Heathcliff to something else or do one of these portraits of him as a famous person.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you look at the edited version and then the original and they both make the same level of sense then the edit was successful in showing that Heathcliff’s presence was irrelevant in the comic even though his name is on it.

    As for if it’s funny or not that gets into your level of appreciation for anti-jokes, surrealist, dadaist and absurdist humor. It’s not for everyone.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Having understood that it’s an awful comic with an irrelevant main character, I’m still confused on why it’s worth put any effort into editing these comics?

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you look at the edited version and then the original and they both make the same level of sense then the edit was successful in showing that Heathcliff’s presence was irrelevant in the comic even though his name is on it.

      Ah! I see! Okay cool, I’ll look at it in a different light from now on. Thank you!

      As for if it’s funny or not that gets into your level of appreciation for anti-jokes, surrealist, dadaist and absurdist humor. It’s not for everyone.

      Haha okay good, I’ll feel less bad for not “getting it” now. 😅

      Take care!