I propose 2024 is the year of early access games boycott.

Bring back completed games only.

  • Icalasari@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Eh, early access isn’t the problem. Palworld has been wrecking Pokemon despite being Early Access

    Can 2024 instead be the year of bad game boycott? When an early access game is better than most AAA completed games, then there’s a serious problem

      • aard@kyu.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Preordering made sense when games came in nice boxes, and you wanted to be sure to play it on the day of release instead of waiting for restocking. With digital downloads now which are not limited in quantity it is just stupid.

        • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This, 100%. The only value of preordering is guaranteeing stock of a physical item that threatens to be out of stock if you were to buy it walk-in. In the modern digital age where downloading tens of gigabytes that take up no space, ship near-instantly on demand, and have theoretically infinite supply, preordering is pointless if the actual game itself is all you care about.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        May it’s my age, but I feel like d3 was significantly more popular that d4 is.

        Since it’s required to be online I’m 100% skipping it.

        I’m also Skipping it because they took overwatch 1 away from me. So no more blizzard games until overwatch 1 comes back.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Early Access is a problem when big publishers try to do it. It makes sense that indies do it so they have cash flow at all. Big outlets have funding on hand, but are trying to leverage it, anyway.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Using us as test dummies is still better than releasing an unfinished piece of shit for full price.

  • Smeagol666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a fan of the Diablo franchise, I knew D4$ was going to be complete dogshit, so I never bought it. Every time I watch one of the professional streamers complain, I laugh my ass off. I think Hawg had it right; their plan is to dribble content to the player base a little at a time as a money grab.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I mean, just do a little due diligence, Jesus. I’ve bought PalWorld, Planet Crafter, Traveler’s Rest, and more in early access and had a blast with all of them. In fact, I’d say it’s some of the best bang for my buck in the last ten years of gaming. I’ve also not bought early access games because the five minutes of due diligence suggested that it was a garbage game.

    I particularly think it’s fine with small, indie studios that don’t have a lot of devs or resources. No way in fuck am I buying an early access AAA release.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The thing is, early access games aren’t necessary unplayable.

    If they are good enough in their current form to warrant the price, then that is a good time to buy them. The updates are only a bonus at that point.

    But don’t buy early access for the promised features, since they may never arrive.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m very anti-pre-order, but early access I’m okay with. It comes with the same decision process as buying anything else, is what I’m getting right now worth the money I’m paying? If yes, then buy it, if no then don’t. I don’t buy promises, I buy products.

    Baldurs gate 3 is a good example of early access done right. I knew going in I was getting the first 4 levels and roughly 1/4 - 1/3 of the planned final game, but what was there already was worth the price I paid, even if they never finished or released it, I got my money’s worth imo. I put like 200+ hours into it before it released, i can’t be mad at that for 30 bucks.

  • Mannimarco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    RimWorld, Subnautica, darkest dungeon, streets of rogue, project zomboid, oxygen not included, starsector, skull the hero slayer, dead cells, caves of qud quasimorph and universim are games i bought in early access that I do not regret in the slightest.

    I’d say the biggest problem is these big companies who release “finished” games that are clearly not finished and the people who keep pre-ordering them

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only game I ever considered pre-ordering was Hogwarts legacy. I’ve always loved the world of Harry Potter, and it looked like everything I’ve ever asked for. I was going to pre-order it, but I wasn’t able to, for financial reasons. Then the game came out, and after watching a video I was like… Oh, this is boring. I learned my lesson.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’d probably like the first part of the game when you’re in Hogwarts and Hogsmeade. The problem is everything after that.

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I haven’t played it most just read the news about it. But to me It maybe early access but it doesn’t sound like a subpar game.

      • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s fun and scratches the Pokemon itch better than the switch games. I wish the pals evolved and there was a story but I’ve already gotten my money’s worth in it’s current state

        • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Really? To me it feels like

          60% Ark/Rust + 15% Pokémon Legends Arceus dodging and throwing + 20% Amazon Warehouse Simulator + 5% Zelda/GenshinImpact climbing

              • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’ve never played those other games you mentioned but Palworld definitely scratches it for me. I wish there were poke centers/Marts and other iconic pokemon tropes but I’m having more fun with it than any pokemon game I’ve played in many years. I didn’t play Arceus because it doesn’t have gyms but the other switch Pokemon games are barely polished turds compared to Palworld.

                • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Actually Legends: Arceus and Palworld are pretty similar.

                  Fun-wise, Arceus plateau’d for me after like 15 hour, while with Palworld I’m already 48 hours in and still going strong.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I respect people who wait for games to leave early access, but there are genuinely great indies in EA that are more polished than most AAA titles. Take each title on a case by case basis. Don’t give shitty devs/pubs your hard earned money.

    • Manzas@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Satisfactory pirated it in early access liked it bought it in early access

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Where does “buying it 10 years later so that it can run on whatever the modern equivalent of a teacup is” fit in?

    Playing witcher 3 on steamdeck for the first time.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I did witcher 3 like 3 years ago. What a great time I had. My previous PC was barely mid tier in 2012. When I built a new one in 2019 it was a piece of cake to run in an ultra wide monitor with cranked settings.

      • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I ran it on a mid range business machine from 2014 with mostly mild upgrades and a 1060 6GB. I’ve since upgraded everything but the GPU, need to have another stab but I keep playing CS2 instead. When I’m not playing that it’s TOTK on the Switch.

  • dasgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I also love the convenience of bulk buying dlcs and games in steam sales. 80% off everything? Now the whole deal costs less than one DLC 4 years ago? Boy howdy.