• spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    inb4 apple gets full consumer support for doing something absolutely less secure than microsoft’s on-device copilot garbage

    don’t get me wrong, both companies are trash but it’s always impressive how apple uses marketing to pull off parallel implementations with 99% less uproar. articles like this are just the grassroots of what it’s planning to maximize support

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        genuinely huh? why must you be so unkind i just shared my thoughts based on knowledge of the past :/ this site is so nasty sometimes

        • B0rax@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t take offense in random comments. There are trolls everywhere.

          I thought your comment was well thought out and contributed to the discussion.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            thanks, genuinely lmao. the trolls have discovered they can throw around the word “troll” for fun now i guess 😭

  • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Editorialized title for Lemmy or AB testing? I’m seeing this for title instead:

    Apple’s AI plans involves ‘black box’ for cloud data

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This is the title I still get when using Voyager title auto-fill even though I see it’s different now. Thankfully this is not reddit so I updated it now.

    • TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Possible the source website just changed the title after the article was shared and Lemmy pulled the metadata.

  • __init__@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So the information still leaves your device. I don’t understand how the manufacturer of the hardware in the data center makes a difference to privacy or security?

    • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t know all the technical details of how this works, but I read that they’re planning to use their “Secure Enclave” functionality, which is hardware based.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, but it’ll be Secure Enclave in data centre hardware, not on your phone. Basically they’re just using their own proprietary HSMs to encrypt data on the server.

        Not convinced that this will really add any privacy benefits over other confidential computing solutions already offered by AWS/Google Cloud/Azure. That said, it is fairly private - just not as good as on-device.

        • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not saying it’ll be any more secure/private, as like I said I don’t know the technical details behind it. But that is the explanation for why they’re using all of their own chips for it.