• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That seems like an inherently false statement. If it was sarcastic, it would be false because it actually is going great. If it’s not sarcastic, than the project is not actually going great.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      My interpretation is that the project status is actually going great, and that was an honest statement, but then calling the scientist a genius was sarcasm, not because of project issues, but just an unrelated assessment.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The project could not be going great but also the AI is just incorrect about the status of the project rather than being sarcastic

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it’s sarcastic, it actually worked and the inventor might be a genius, but maybe the AI doesn’t like him and wants to make fun of him anyway.