Hey Privacy people,

I am looking for a OneNote alternative for all my campaign notes for my tabletop RPGs. I was looking at Obsidian.md as an option and wondering what their data collection is like?

Fot all my personal and private notes I use standard notes but the free version is not quite roboist enougj. I can’t afford to pay premium any time soon I need a free option I can use.

Any suggestions ?

    • constantokra@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unless you need specific functionality that silver bullet doesn’t provide, i’d start there. It’s very similar to logseq, but doesn’t have a bunch of questionable design choices based around a paid sync monetization scheme. Silverbullet is self hosted and has a web app. Logseq is a webapp, packaged for Android and desktop, but only allowed file access for your data so you can’t self host sync… Because they charge for that. It’s a mess.

        • constantokra@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I do too. My point is there’s already a web app you can self host, but you can’t store your data on your server. The web app uses the local file access framework, which is just dumb. There’s no reason for this except to be able to monetize sync, and that’s also dumb because as you said, sync thing works fine. But they’re making a bad choice to explicitly remove functionality, and that doesn’t make me feel confident about the future of the project.

          • hasecilu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            For this exact reason I switched to Trilium, I can acces on all my devices. I’m very expectant of the new fork Trilium Next.

          • TheSun@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t know, they have to monetise somehow. Paying for the convenience of sync seems like a valid path especially given there’s fully functional alternative syncs available for free.

            • constantokra@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I don’t disagree. My problem is not with their choice of monetizing sync. My problem is with their choice to package a web app for Android and desktop, provide that same web app for self hosting, but not allow you to store the data in the web app. In the discussions on GitHub they claim it’s just something they can’t tackle right now, or whatever. No. It’s functionality that was specifically stripped because that’s how every other self hosted web app works and the local storage framework they use is obviously bolted on and not well supported by browsers. In other words, they’re manufacturing problems to sell you a solution. And again, that’s their decision to make. It just doesn’t seem like they make good decisions, and we’re talking about an app you put a lot of work and data into.