For reference: Article 48 Wikipedia I’m trying to understand how anyone with any knowledge of the history of dictators could possibly justify granting a president unchecked “official” power so if anyone has any actual theories I am ALL ears.

  • johant@lemmy.ml
    0·
    6 months ago

    “declares that evidence concerning acts for which the President is immune can play no role in any criminal prosecution against him.”

    To me (as a non-US citizen and outside observer) this seems to be the real problem. Seems to present a catch-22 to me. What am I missing?