Nintendo’s full case filing


https://twitter.com/stephentotilo/status/1762576284817768457/

"NEW: Nintendo is suing the creators of popular Switch emulator Yuzu, saying their tech illegally circumvents Nintendo’s software encryption and facilitates piracy. Seeks damages for alleged violations and a shutdown of the emulator.

Notes 1 million copies of Tears of the Kingdom downloaded prior to game’s release; says Yuzu’s Patreon support doubled during that time. Basically arguing that that is proof that Yuzu’s business model helps piracy flourish."

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re conflating the idea of code and keys. The keys are explicitly illegal as they directly fall under nintendo copyright.

    The code is also falling under breach of dmca, as its entire use and focus is to break drm. This is the sticking point here.

    Again, to labor the point, it’s nothing about the keys, we don’t need to talk about the keys.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m using code in the sense of the word pass codes. Like, encryption codes. The codes you input to an encryption algorithm, along with the cyphertext, to get the plaintext.

      But yes, Nintendo and you are saying that distributing Yuzu is illegal because it can only be used to violate the DMCA.

      I disagree.

      It can also be used in compliance with the DMCA, and nothing it includes are the intellectual property of Nintendo. There are exceptions to the rule about circumventing copy protection, and as long as you use Yuzu with an intent (such as security research) that falls in one of these exceptions, you can use Yuzu legally.

      As long as Yuzu is never distributed by its authors with the encryption codes, it shouldn’t be illegal, even according to the DMCA. Otherwise, there would be no way to circumvent copy protection for legal purposes with regard to Switch games.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can disagree if you like, nintendos lawyers, prior art, and everyone who understands the dmca isn’t going to agree with your stance at all.

        Your stance is a moral one. The dmca is not moral. It exists to limit your freedoms in favor of companies’ profits. Enjoy your blinkered outlook.

        Also, never use the word code like that, it’s incorrect and everyone will misunderstand you. It’s wrong. Use encryption key.