• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Have you consulted with a lawyer about this? The laws differ from place to place, but I’d be worried the equity you give him may also grant him some sort of claim on the house, which would mean he gets a say on financial things related to the real estate. This can complicate things in the future.

    Also - what does “percentage of revenue if we end up keeping and paying it off years later” mean? That after he leaves you will pay him for his share in your house?

    • ThatGiantCameron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have and officially on paper he is a normal renter. Since this kind of deal doesn’t happen there’s really no system so his payout is a handshake deal on sale, as of now only around 8%. As for if the property is kept, once fully paid off he would receive a yearly dividend of what was made off rent, which wouldn’t be much as we won’t charge much above operating and maintenance cost. Truthfully keeping it is the less likely option as we would like to sell so he can walk away with a decent down payment on his own place.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        So if you don’t sell it, and instead rent it out to other people, he’d get a portion of the rent the future tenant pays? And I don’t supposed said future tenant will also get equity?

        • ThatGiantCameron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m still working on a good way to provide value to a tenant for the rent they pay for a paid off property. Once it’s paid off I only want to be charging what it takes to maintain plus a little more for unexpected problems. But again, keeping it is the less likely scenario. Down payments on their own place is the goal!