I <3 Open Source
That should be obvious by now, right? I’ve been out here blogging about Open Source stuff for over a decade, and occasionally I still have time to actually write code.
What if my experimental protocol is approaching the 3 month removal period but I am missing ACKs due to reviewer inactivity?
Contributors engaging in good faith protocol development should not be penalized due to reviewer inactivity.
It is advised that experimental protocol authors post memes to the base MR until reviewers become active.
What if an experimental protocol author posts memes to the MR for many months rather than furthering development?
It is expected that protocol authors are seriously attempting to reach staging/ status.
If it is determined by members that this is not the case for a given experimental protocol after a three month period
has elapsed, the one week removal notice may be invoked regardless of how good the memes may be.
This is great:
What if my experimental protocol is approaching the 3 month removal period but I am missing ACKs due to reviewer inactivity?
Contributors engaging in good faith protocol development should not be penalized due to reviewer inactivity. It is advised that experimental protocol authors post memes to the base MR until reviewers become active.
What if an experimental protocol author posts memes to the MR for many months rather than furthering development?
It is expected that protocol authors are seriously attempting to reach staging/ status. If it is determined by members that this is not the case for a given experimental protocol after a three month period has elapsed, the one week removal notice may be invoked regardless of how good the memes may be.