Example; the Legend of Zelda: BotW and TotK weapon degradation system. At first I was annoyed at it, but once I stopped caring about my “favorite weapon” I really started to enjoy the system. I think it lends really well to the sandbox nature of the game and it itches that resourcefulness nature inside me.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Considering in prior Zelda games you didn’t have to worry about your sword being unusable or your shield breaking, I can understand why folks weren’t so keen on it in the new ones. Yeah you could run out of magic, arrows, or bombs, but that boomerang wasn’t going anywhere.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      that boomerang wasn’t going anywhere.

      Tbh, if I had a boomerang as a weapon, I’d get precisely one throw out of it (whether I hit anything or not).

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      BotW is just not a Zelda game at all. It is a very mid outdoor walking simulator with fetch quests. I don’t care about the breakable weapons, even. I want the collection of tools, the long dungeons with puzzles using those tools, and the bosses vulnerable to those tools.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It has dungeons: The four divine beasts.

        IMO It put a lot of the “Use a particular tool for this” puzzles into the shrines to scratch the puzzle solvers itch, (along with some of the Korok seeds.) but even those still gave leeway to not having to use those tools at all.