Hey all! I’m wondering if someone can help me pick between these two apps. They seem to be the most commonly recommended Android front-ends for OpenStreetMaps, but I’m wondering what the pros/cons/differences are. Thanks in advance!

  • onion@feddit.de
    0·
    10 months ago

    (I haven’t used osmand in a minute)

    Osmand has a buttload of features but the UI is kinda complicated, whereas OrganicMaps has a simple UI but less features.

    If you want car navigation I’d recommend MagicEarth because it has traffic info

    • AnActOfCreation@programming.devOP
      0·
      10 months ago

      Thanks, that’s a nice and concise summary!

      Where does MagicEarth get its traffic data from? Also is it FOSS? I couldn’t find much about it.

      • governorkeagan@lemdro.idEnglish
        0·
        10 months ago

        Some of it is user reported. I think they have a 3rd party provider as well but I’m not 100% certain on that.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            0·
            10 months ago

            who care too much about Free software

            There’s a difference between caring and caring too much. I care about eating healthy. Doesn’t mean I never eat anything unhealthy and immediately throw people who try to eat a sweet out of my third-floor window.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
          0·
          10 months ago

          It kind is, though. Proprietary doesn’t mean paid; I’ll pay for OSS apps. Proprietary means they won’t release the source code, and this is bad for a whole bunch of reasons. But the reason that gets my goat is that it’s almost guaranteed that proprietary app was developed with open source tools, and probably uses at least some open source code. I fucking hate hypocrites.

      • Odious@feddit.de
        0·
        10 months ago

        For some people, not getting stuck in traffic is worth using proprietary software.

        Are there any FOSS navigation apps with (paid?) traffic info?

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    0·
    10 months ago

    Big pro for Organic Maps is rendering speed. So smooth and perfect…
    Everything else is on the OsmAnd side. It’s loaded with features, everything you may want and more. But rendering lag is so annoying that I’m using Organic by default.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    0·
    10 months ago

    OSMand is a much more powerful tool even with no plugins and it’s a mature app you can count on.

    • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
      0·
      10 months ago

      On the other hand Organic Maps has less features, which means a much simpler interface and much better performance

      • zecg@lemmy.world
        0·
        10 months ago

        Performance of OSMand is actually great on mid-level SOCs I usually get. Anything with snapdragon 6xx or more and performance is a non-issue for me, especially since it has a new opengl2 renderer. Also, it uses very, very little battery navigating me with voice (so screen off) along a pre-defined GPX on locally downloaded maps in airplane mode. And the simplicity of the interface is a downside once you spend a few hours tinkering with OSMand and get used to all it can do.

  • governorkeagan@lemdro.idEnglish
    0·
    10 months ago

    I’ll go ahead and throw another option out there. Magic Earth. I would use OsmAnd or Organic Maps more often but neither support routing with public transport other than the train.

  • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
    0·
    10 months ago

    I thinl they are intended for very different kind of users and use cases: Organic Maps is a simple and traightforward navigtaion app. It does not do much, but does it very well. OsmAnd is a feature-rich app for power users who want to tinker and customize.

    I have both on my phone :)