Looking up those patents, the first alludes to a system where a player aims and fires an “item” toward a character in a field, and in doing so triggers combat, and then dives into extraordinary intricacies about switching between modes within this. The second is very similar, but seems more directly focused on tweaking previous patents to including being able to capture Pokémon in the wild, rather than only during battle. The third, rather wildly, seems to be trying to claim a modification to the invention of riding creatures in an open world and being able to transition between them easily.

  • Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Given that each charge is only for $33,000, so about $100,000 total, I expect a settlement will be reached instead of going on this fight.

    Unfortunately that would be the worst outcome for everyone else.

    The patents need to be contested and invalidated or smaller devs will feel they can’t use these mechanics.