• catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Incorrect. I’m starting from a translation which God himself allowed into the world. Since God allowed both of these translations then it must mean both things are correct. The woman in this situation could be pregnant or not. Stop questioning God’s power.

    The Bible is not something for you to just pick and choose what you want it to say. Just because you already have an opinion on abortion doesn’t mean you can cherry pick different translations to support your pre conceived premise. Do you know Hebrew? Were you there when God gave this word to the Israelites? No? Then all we have is the Bible that God himself allowed to be put out into the world. You don’t get to question what God has provided and manipulate His word for your own selfish, political talking points. It’s honestly really troublesome and borderline heretical. I’m worried for your soul. Stop speaking for God and let Him speak for Himself.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The Bible that was put out into the world was in Hebrew which does not mention anything to do with a miscarriage. To say that because it exists it is permissible, is like saying that the holocaust was morally okay and correct because “God allowed it to happen”

      • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The Bible does not say that every historical event is God breathed. Only that the Bible itself is. You’re gambling with your eternal soul to make a political talking point. Blasphemy is a serious issue. Please consider what you’re doing.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          That scripture predates the NIV and the English language as a whole.