• eramseth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah they didn’t test that. Nor did they test having the app installed but not running. Crummy article tbh.

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Disagree, and i don’t think it’s the point.

      As an average user, why am I paying a performance hit for nvidia’s own “recommended parameters”

      That’s trash and a terrible experience, and they should be called out for it.

      • eramseth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think you’re understanding. The testing they did was presumably fine and the performance hit is probably unacceptable. But mentioning but not testing the scenarios of

        • app installed but not running
        • app installed and running but overlay turned off

        Is kinda mailing it in.

        • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ll give you that, yep, sure.

          But that doesn’t invalidate the data they did get, it’s just not a full picture.