ActivityPub has remained the dominant Fediverse protocol over the past few years. In that time, many bright ideas have come on how to improve the spec. Here’s where those efforts are today.

  • TheVillageGuy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    One thing I miss in activitypub is a verification system. This is most important for deletion. For example, when something is deleted on one instance, there’s no way of knowing for sure if it will be deleted from other instances as well. An instance being down or malfunctioning can cause deletion to fail with no way to know* and try again for op.

    *To know one would have to check every single subscribing instance. Trying to delete an already deleted item is obviously impossible

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      As far as Lemmy is concerned, there’s been some work happening in regards to deletions. You can see in the pull requests on Github.

            • rmuk@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s like saying “prove you don’t own a poodle”. How do you prove that? I can tell you I don’t own a poodle… but how can you be sure?

            • qaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              there’s no way of knowing for sure if it will be deleted from other instances

              You can’t be sure if something is deleted, because there is no way to prove you don’t have something.

              However, if you just want to check if the instance claims to have deleted something, you could probably just perform a GET request for the specific object as defined in the activitypub spec.