At this year’s FediForum one of the breakout sessions centred around the Theadiverse, the subset of ActivityPub-enabled applications built around a group-centric model of content representation.
The main outcome of the meeting involved the genesis of an informal working group for the threadiverse, in order to align our disparate implementations toward a common path.
If you’re developer of a threadverse app/platform and interested in being involved, read more at https://mastodon.social/@julian@community.nodebb.org/112124227775597261 or https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17908/threadiverse-working-group
Honestly, I think this is an extremely cynical take. It takes a lot of effort to organize and run something like this, and nobody is getting rich off of it. If anything, it’s pretty meagre compensation to set off infrastructure and organizational costs.
The talks themselves are also a informed by privacy concerns: some attendees are fine with being directly cited in notes / recorded / talked about, but a lot of people just wanted to be part of conversations and do not want that.
I think some of your suggestions in your last paragraph are actually pretty good, but I also think it’s a little unfair to make demands here. No aspect of running this thing is easy, and the whole “why don’t they just?” attitude from the sidelines is kind of unsavory when a lot of us went out of our way to pay extra to make sure there were more than enough $1.99 “almost free” tickets.
Like, if that’s not good enough for you, I’m pretty sure nothing is.
I just stated an example of what’s good enough for me 😐
If you think people’s preferences are “demands”, that’s your issue. I didn’t write a blog article and spam the fediverse to try and change how fediforum is run, nor did I look up who the organisers are and tell them “you must make these changes!”.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0