• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    It’s not convoluted at all. It’s extremely simple: if you want to (edit: legally) play first party Nintendo titles (or other exclusives), you MUST buy a switch. If you don’t care about Nintendo exclusives, there’s absolutely no reason to own a switch. That has been true of every, single Nintendo console ever released… except for the Wii. People bought a Wii so they could play a motion control game with Grandma once or twice, and then just let the console sit and collect dust.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      When the Switch 1 released there was nothing else on the market like it. Play handheld on the bus, get home, dock it, continue playing in full HD. That is amazing. I didn’t get the Switch 1 because of the exclusives, it was the versatility that got me.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I agree that Nintendo was ahead of the curve when it came to expanding portable gaming, but the only reason the switch sold so many units, and ultimately got so many games ported to it, was because of Nintendo first party titles. If you look at the best selling switch titles, the vast majority of them are Nintendo games. Without Nintendo first party titles, the switch would have been far outsold by better devices.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      People bought a Wii so they could play a motion control game with Grandma once or twice

      I’d give up everything just to do this…