I see people talking about doas saying it’s just like sudo but with less features. I’m just wondering if there is any situation where you should use doas or if it’s just personal preference.

  • WalrusByte@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    9 months ago

    From what I hear, doas is more secure. I don’t think it matters though, as long as you keep your system updated. I use sudo still.

    • ZephrC@lemm.ee
      9·
      9 months ago

      It’s really only more secure in the sense that in general more complicated programs have more things that can go wrong with them. Either bugs, or just user error.

      That is a valid concern, and most people don’t need or use any of sudo’s extra features, so it’s completely reasonable to switch to doas because of that, but it’s not like there’s some glaring security flaw in sudo that most people really need to worry about. Especially if they’re not doing weird things in the config, which would mostly be the same people who could easily switch to doas anyway.

        • bleistift2@feddit.deEnglish
          91·
          9 months ago

          sudo maintains ‘sudo state’ for 15 minutes. After that you need to enter the password again.

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          6·
          9 months ago

          It’s entirely configurable but I think by default sudo will “cache” your authentication for a period of time so multiple commands in the same session only need the password entered once. You can even configure sudo to not need a password for certain commands (although obviously you need to be careful you’re not opening a hole in your security).

          • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
            2·
            9 months ago

            doas is likewise configurable; though the mechanism that keeps track of the timeout is different on OpenBSD (where doas originated) & Linux ---- and there used to be some reservations about the latter implementation.