• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This seems like a bad idea.

    What sort of protections are in place against nefarious actors that gain access to this network? Do they do anything to isolate each connected device from each other so that two devices on the network cannot connect to each other, such as making use of subnets? Are users connections throttled, and if so, to what degree? Are certain websites blocked to prevent potential malicious actors from intercepting sensitive data more easily, such as bank sites?

    I mean, the idea is a well intentioned one, but I can easily see this going very wrong very quickly.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know, I find people do all sorts of stuff with their networks all the time that has me scratching my head trying to figure out why they set it that way when I am eventually called to fix it.

      • arrakark@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes… But technically you do have other legal obligations like reporting and certain data collection, like who owns what IP for example.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your bank credentials can be intercepted that way, then the bank had poor security. They’re not responsible for that anymore than any other ISP.