• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s like saying “Dumbledore had the biggest assault rifle of anyone, so he can do anything”.

    Sure he was a powerful duelist, but a group of others could take him down.

    So, setting the “power” aside, he has 2 choices:

    1. Operate within the system and bureaucracy to effect change via normal political motion

    2. Use non combat magic to manipulate others, (time travel, invisibility, foresight) effectively hoping to be a benevolent authoritarian

    If he goes with 1, he has to maintain favor. You can see how tenuous that is, with his favor slipping during the unrest. The parents wouldn’t take their kids out of Hogwarts long term, they’d kick.dumbledore out instead.

    For the most part it’s feasible that he could have made more direct changes to the school, yes. Good point.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, the two modes. Timid acceptance of the status quo with minor calls for change behind closed or full blown revolution and authoritarianism.

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Did you not present binary options where the first option is what Dumbledore did in the books and the other option is him being authoritarian. Are there more numbers on your option list I didn’t see?

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The first is not being timid. You made that up. He is a prominent, popular member of the political class, with significant sway and influence.

            At the end of the comment I acknowledged that he could probably have moved faster with changes at the school. Dunno if you read that far.

            I’m essentially saying he can either be a rational, normal member of a society (albeit well positioned ), or resort to authoritarian options. Are you suggesting another, or did you just want to keep being annoying?

            • Fisk400@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              If he was against the use of house elves in the book he was extremely timid about it. At no point in the books does he present himself as a political player in the world.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Ok so timid is your thing, you made it sound like it was my thing.

                And what? He’s constantly working with the ministry, speaking to the council, running political errands

                  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Sounds like 2 important topics that a leader should be concerned with. Maybe if the whole Voldemort thing never happened other topics could have been addressed but we have nothing on that