Neither the article, nor the OP are saying anything that could remotely be construed as support for Hamas. As far as I can see, nobody in the comments is either.
Likud = bad
Hamas = bad
And for good measure:
Tories = bad
Reform = bad
Republicans = bad
Australian Liberal Party = bad
And to a lesser extent:
New Labour = bad
Democrats = bad
I didn’t say anything about people supporting hamas your the one who said an unconscious binary interpretation is possible through the polite mechanism of accusing me of exactly that. I’m not here to argue about Israel Palestine I’m here to point out bad logic in a purely objective manner.
Yeah I think that’s what’s being implied. Especially by those people making a binary decision with no nuance.
Which people, though?
Neither the article, nor the OP are saying anything that could remotely be construed as support for Hamas. As far as I can see, nobody in the comments is either.
And for good measure: Tories = bad Reform = bad Republicans = bad Australian Liberal Party = bad
And to a lesser extent: New Labour = bad Democrats = bad
They are all bad.
I didn’t say anything about people supporting hamas your the one who said an unconscious binary interpretation is possible through the polite mechanism of accusing me of exactly that. I’m not here to argue about Israel Palestine I’m here to point out bad logic in a purely objective manner.
I didn’t say that, that was the guy you replied to before. I replied to your response to him, so I can see how the mixup happened though.
All I was saying is that there are no good guys here, and I’ve seen no evidence that anyone is implying anything other than that.
You are the one who said you thought it was being implied.