• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s hard to do well, but I disagree that it’s a slap in the face or a low blow. The gender swap of Starbuck from Battlestar Galactic was seen as sacrilege by fans, but she became one of the highlights of the show. Miles Morales was a creative way to do a race swap for Spider Man, and the narrative is richer for it. Jason Mamoa turned Aquaman from white to Polynesian, and the depiction was better than ever. Would Nick Fury be better as a white guy, as he was originally for decades, instead of Samuel L Jackson?

    And then there are all the “swaps” that happen before the first day of filming, like Ellen Ripley, Sigourney Weaver’s character in Alien, who was originally (edit) going to be cast as a man. This was “controversial” at the time, with people decrying “political correctness”. I would not take “causing controversy” as a reliable indicator for whether something sucks.

    Edit: point taken about gender neutral script. See discussion below.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Miles Morales isn’t a race swap. That’s why it works and everyone likes it (well, except actual racists).

      It’s an entirely new character that exists in the spiderman multiverse and has a different personality and backstory from Peter Parker. That’s what inclusivity actually should look like.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Imo, it’s why it works. It’s different and original, and even fits in the same story as the old ones.

          Obviously I have no objective proof of that, but you can’t even hypothetically think about what would’ve happened if it was just a race swap, because the whole premise of the movie is that Miles isn’t Peter Parker.