What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I’m using Nextcloud but I’m thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Nah. The Premium model is kinda bullshit. As a free tier open source user you will always be a second class citizen.

      Also everyone who wants to commit code has to sign away his rights for them.

      tl;dr maintainer gets money from open source contribution over the premium tier, but hinders everyone else to do the same with the AGPL licence.(kinda)

      That’s not a good foundation to start off.

    • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.comEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

      I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

      I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

      So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I’ve found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

      My money’s going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

      • azron@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        The user feature is available for non paying users too. If you want a gui for managing that is now behind plus. I don’t see exactly how wantng to make a living off of your work makes you a greedy cunt especially when it seems the features trickle down as they should. Am I missing something?

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          It’s about expectation setting. You can’t say “paid donators will get X” then say “actually you won’t, give us more money for X”.

          • tuhriel@infosec.pubEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            Also, there’s usually no reason as a user to pay monthly for a feature in a self-hosted application.
            The Dev has no monthly costs for that feature. Let me buy the application/feature, and if you need money for a new feature, create a feature that is worth buying again. No need to bully the user into a monthly subscription…