• Waker@lemmy.world
    0·
    1 year ago

    I’m not American so I might not fully understand the repercussions of this. (houses being demolished and stuff)

    But I honestly prefer the current version. It seems to have more green spaces. The highways could be shit, but if it meant better public transportation them I’m all for it (buses for instance). Maybe kill a few lanes and get a train going there or something…

    I don’t know, the old layout seems very claustrophobic to me. The newer one seems to have more potential.

    Edit: Upon reviewing the picture again, I think the previous version had a lot of parks that seemed “claustrophobic” but it’s just because it’s a B&W picture… So maybe I’d change my mind and go with the older one.

    • adrian783@lemmy.world
      0·
      1 year ago

      they demolished a medium density neighborhood for highways so suburbs can commute in and out of inner city. when you destroy neighborhoods and create “green space”, people don’t just stop existing. they either get pushed to the suburbs if they can afford it, or (most likely) the ghettos.

      and how does highway create public transit?

      highway is a mechanism to separate the undesired that cannot afford cars. kill a few lanes and build trains would mean “those people” can reach “our neighborhoods”.

  • Square Singer@feddit.de
    0·
    1 year ago

    Sure the designers of this monstrosity thought, “There are only black people living there, so it’s a win-win” -.-

  • EthicalAI@beehaw.org
    0·
    1 year ago

    “Trains Are Too Expensive And Would Take Years To Build“ - guy who remembers the interstate being built.