• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I think the research was done prior to that event. It’s a bit dated at this point.

    Also, it’s a bit ambiguous how to count Hong Kong as a semi-autonomous region in China. Should you measure by percentage of Hong Kongers or percentage of Chinese? I might think the latter, since they’re subject to the force of that nation.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I don’t think we can accept your argument, because in point in fact Hong Kong was an independent country. Certainly trying to disagree but now we’re getting into a definition question, but if that’s going to stop us from applying the proposed principle, then we can do that in every situation.

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        Hong Kong was an independent country

        Not too sure about that. PRC’s PLA has literally been in HK since 1997. You can’t really call yourself “independent” when you have an outside force occupying you.

        Taiwan does have its own military, so that’s why they are considered de facto independant.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        HK has literally never been independent, it went from being a Qing fishing village to a British concession, to a British overseas territory and then to a PRC special autonomous region.

        It came close to full autonomy during the end of British rule and the start of PRC rule (before Xi), but it never has been independent.