• hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        TBH I would switch to Nix, from my current long standing arch, but it wouldn’t make any difference to me ultimately. Cool concept though, but I don’t really care much about these immutable distros.

        • Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I have to say the immutability isn’t what got me. It’s that i can propagate changes to all my machines (i have three, with different configurations of work and private users) without fuss. i have one git repo that contains the Config and all i do is git pull && sudo nixos-rebuild switch after i login and it’s done. reinstalling is also somewhat trivial and once the installer is done everything is as i want it to be. which is just bonkers to me. i love it to bits. before i had a super brittle system of dotfiles that regularly broke. nevermore

          • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That does make sense for such use cases, however I feel that archinstall script is also mature enough, allowing you to have config files even. Even w/o them it still has very powerful defaults. I will def give nixos a try in a VM first, as I mostly rely on flatpak and landlock anyways.