• jsomae@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think the more important takeaway from this article is not the political one, but that problems with a biological fix can be extremely easy to solve compared to problems that require societal change, even though we normally think of it as being the other way around.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I still feel that the distinction is not so clear.

      Why is “banning lead” seen as a biological “change”, but “banning soda” is tagged as a “social effort”?

      I re-read it and I get a feeling that what it’s talking about is not so much “biological” vs “social” but rather… “physiological” vs “psychological”, and arguing that psychology can be a lot more complex to deal with than physiology. Which I guess is fair.