• buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I was just wondering the connection between flatpaks and the terminal because I’ve never heard of flatpaks before and Wikipedia says they’re a sandboxed package management system or something?

    • Aimeeloulm@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      As someone who uses Flatpak you can still use the terminal to install, uninstall and do maintenance, not sure why people believe terminal is useless with Flatpak 😞

      Flatpaks are containers, same as Snaps, I personally prefer Flatpaks over Snaps, but just my personal choice. I use Flatsweep and Flatseal apps to help administrate Flatpak apps, but use terminal as well 🙂

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve no real preference so long as my PC starts stuff. The reason I avoid flatpaks is because I have at some point acquired the habit of anything I install that’s not an appimage I pretty much launch from the terminal and I remember trying flatpaks and them having names like package.package.nameofapp-somethingelse and I can’t keep that in my head.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve actually been discussing the idea of Flatpaks offering “terminal aliases”, similar to what Snaps do, with some people involved in Flatpak. It’s something that could happen in the future, but for now, you can totally create an alias to run a Flatpak from a single word, it’s just a PITA.