jackpot@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 10 months agowhats best? gitlab github codeberg bitbucket etc. and why?message-squaremessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squarewhats best? gitlab github codeberg bitbucket etc. and why?jackpot@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareLoki@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoWhat’s best is probably hosting your own git server (for hopefully obvious reasons).
minus-squareCapillary7379@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoFrom personal experience, if you’re hosting Gitlab and make it available to the internet, make sure to keep it updated or your server will be super slow hosting a crypto miner within a year.
minus-squarePatMustard@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoGood advice for anything you’re hosting!
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 months agoIf you have the ability to host your own, then agreed 100% host your own. Microsoft proved that if companies are more than happy to mine your code
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoDepends on what you’re doing. If you want free offsite backups, collaboration with others, integration with other tools, etc., then self-hosting is the worst option.
What’s best is probably hosting your own git server (for hopefully obvious reasons).
From personal experience, if you’re hosting Gitlab and make it available to the internet, make sure to keep it updated or your server will be super slow hosting a crypto miner within a year.
Good advice for anything you’re hosting!
If you have the ability to host your own, then agreed 100% host your own. Microsoft proved that if companies are more than happy to mine your code
Depends on what you’re doing.
If you want free offsite backups, collaboration with others, integration with other tools, etc., then self-hosting is the worst option.