• Omegamint [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    An absurd amount of marketing, mainly. Very easy to shove YA/childrens books down kids throats, they don’t have a lot of natural exposure to literature. Fuck, eragorn was the best example of the YA industry pushing a bad series (they even tried a movie series), I remember loaning it from my school library and being legitimately confused as to why it was becoming popular. I ended up finding a weird romance+fantasy series at the time that I largely consider as not being actually good, but remember finding it way more engaging. Maybe it’s better now that kids are largely terminally online.

    It’s really my biggest gripe with it. There’s better fantasy, better wizard centric fantasy, and better YA books out there. It’s not great by any means, and I’m not surprised that I dropped the series without finishing it as a kid because I was reading much better stuff by the time the last few books came out.

    • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly I kind of liked the eragon books though if asked I couldn’t say why.

      The attempted movie adaptation was horrible though

      • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Eragon is likeable despite not being very good. Probably its greatest strength is just how sincere and inoffensive it is. You can really feel that the author was just a kid writing some fantasy stories. I think there’s value in that.

      • bleepbloopbop [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        same. It was long enough ago that I have no real recollection of why but I thought they were good. I even saw the movies. I guess kids aren’t very picky

          • bleepbloopbop [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Guess you’re right. I remember seeing one in theater, which I thought was the second one, but looking it up now that was 2006 (god how was that 18 years ago lmao) and they never made the second one. 100 million budget, made 250 million at the box office, I guess that’s considered a flop. (Edit: yeah I guess it was a flop in the US box office, the majority of that was worldwide)