Let me try : “an Apple”, “an nice Apple” … not sure about the second one …

That’s a real photograph from the LSP post that will be shot next week.

.

2025 February 20, other sources :

.

.

.

i would rather vote for the guy in the tan colored suit.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecanal

(…) In 2021, inhalation of hexadecanal was found to reduce aggression in men but to trigger aggression in women. Hexadecanal is one of the most abundant substances emitted by human babies from their heads, which may be an evolutionary survival mechanism to induce mothers to defend the baby and fathers to not attack it. (…)

GoDiverse …!

[meta] Quite surprising and irritating that the same post you made in !asklemmy was deleted ! Did you manage to save the resulting comments ?

(…) was riding his Segway while walking his dog (…) when he reversed the Segway to allow a fellow dog walker to get past him, he fell from a nearby cliff (…)

Distraction + overconfidence it seems.
Also, had he been on foot, he would have felt the cliff and avoided the accident.

My bad, you are right, this makes much more sense 😋 (i am getting too old !)

This is logically reductible to : a person looks exactly as they look. i find it funny that your (complete) statement confuses GPT-4o mini

Funny and clever.
it got Llama 3.1 a.i. completely confused … which could never translate it right even with my help. But a better a.i. (GPT-4o mini) got it easily the first time and could explain it well.

Social media alternative for TikTok that may go down in the USA.

Nice
( N.B. : Typo : “TIL about vaults, the largest structures in the our cells. No one knows what they’re for.” )

Your bad translation is unfortunately the best one of every horrible translations in here.

Words are spelled stupidly so being bright makes this harder.

No I was not sarcastic. So now i am trying to read your paper and i think that it is above my knowledge level.

As a layman i had the intuition that instead of having two accounts as i proposed for voting and commenting which was implemented by @rimu, we might have had something like blockchain or filecoin or some coin that would represent voting power and that would be based on our commenting value… so that coin would have been an intermediary to make voting anonymous.

Finally i know enough about science that i know that i don’t know much.

Edit : after a rapid overview of the article i would say that this method :
“Blind Signature-Based e-Voting”
would be most appropriate to our social media voting and i noticed the work they have done is more targeting national elections where the outcome is much more important.

Yes but … Navigation icon at the top right of the pages leads to these :
https://join.piefed.social/docs/piefed-mobile/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/developers/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/admin-guide/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/installation/
https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/

@rimu@piefed.social did great on my simple idea and this is very nice to know. He did not implement his other idea of having a pool of available robots that would vote one time each for each one vote of each one user(s) … also I thought it might be implemented in the frontend but he did implement it in the backend.

i did not say before but i was also thinking about complex mechanisms involving some kind of coin that would represent voting power that could be spent when voting or accumulated maybe with some loss of value with time … but then i read about the many research paper that were published about such things … in conclusion i believe we will see many other iterations of such social media.

thanks for the feedback 😌

Thanks @souperk@reddthat.com,
i believe many users will be interested in these papers about cryptographically secure voting.

Amongst them there would be :
@rimu@piefed.social
@SorteKanin@feddit.dk
@brbposting@sh.itjust.works

User’s votes anonymization through this system looks quite nice for me.