I think you’re confused. There is no warning letter, that’s just the takedown notice sent at the same time as the takedown.

You can combine both widget toolkits in one app‽

have you tried plasma 6?

KIT Scenarist seems good to me, despite its creators ditching it for starc.

or filled with commercial and AI tools (Story Architect)

Why not just ignore these tools and use the free ones?

@pcouy Don’t confuse crypto with cryptography; I don’t see anything about cryptocurrencies here

@opensource @andrew

SourceHut actually had a really nice UI! I’ll consider it. I currently don’t have problems with GitLab save for the UI learning curve (and their EE is source-available) but I’ll consider what you’ve said.

To be more concrete, we have to see if nearly all of the released games on the list have been subject to “abnormal review activity”, which steam automatically excludes from the percentage

By AP do you mean API?

It’s not just torrenting. Every user chooses what files they share, and these would be visible in search (and ranked by an internet speed transfer estimate), which makes discoverability a whole lot easier. If you want to download it, a direct transfer is initiated between that user and you computer only. You can also browse all files that a user has shared and chat with them about problems and whatnot (there also are chat rooms). Plus, since it’s not really torrenting apart from the concept, your download history isn’t targeted by popular tools that check out your activity on public trackers.

Last words, circa 29 Jan:

Today, I’m going for a minor procedure at the hospital, and I won’t be available for the next 2-4 days. When I return, I’ll push all the corrections and fixes I’ve been working on and present plans for the near future. In the meantime, I’m making sure that the instance operates smoothly.

Are you sure that’s not just because mbin was syncing changes from kbin? https://github.com/MbinOrg/mbin/pull/231 seems to be the only commit ernest has actually made to mbin directly

Why does nobody ever recommend GitLab

Soulseek

Only if you completely disregard the userland and impound the definition of Linux to the kernel base

Users don’t contribute builds. They contribute a specification file for how the build is made, which through the AUR is downloaded and executed. You can see the package source for every AUR package, and most AUR helpers make you look at the specification file by default.

New packages on flathub are moderated, though I haven’t encountered any problems from AUR’s moderation model either other than it sometimes being slow but harmful stuff is removed pretty fast

I think that’s a Manjarno problem.

I think they want you to talk about the other aspects of use, such as compatibility with hardware an whether there can be significant productivity roadblocks. (That said, the only said roadblock I’ve met is not being able to project and not being able to run a specific Android app)

Flatpaks are isolated while I want to use my input method. Plus, they have larger sizes which can pile up over time