perfect
perfect
black pilled as fuck
those examples I could accept but I think a lot of people use imparted wisdom as “common knowledge” and we should drill down on any claim that is disputed.
you see that you just did, right? it’s tautological.
no. support your claims
a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
calling other users bots is dehumanizing
your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith
This is a huge problem with the FPTP system, but that’s the law for this election. It would be great to change it, but that’s talk for the next one. Voting for a third party ensures that the party you like the least will win in a FPTP system. CGP explains it best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo
that is not the correct analysis. the correct analysis is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, so the solution is values voting, even if you think another party that has somewhat close values has a better chance of winning.
veganism is a specific philosophy, and while variations of vegetarianism predate it, veganism itself dates to the 1940s.
saying something doesn’t make it true. alluding to the existence of evidence is not the same as presenting evidence.
veganism was invented in the 1940s in Britain
this is far afield from the discussion and I have no interest in entertaining it. have a nice day
oh shit. now you’re on my level
whoops. wrong reply button
I’m not saying all vegans think it
it’s a fictional right.
the statute of Anne was the first copyright law and it was written to stop printers in London from breaking each others’ knees over who was allowed to print the world of Shakespeare who was already long dead.
copyright is a bill of goods when packaged as a protection for creatives.
I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365