Is Interstellar support complete? I thought it was still in alpha/beta phase

Indeed, but at the moment only Interstellar has alpha support for Piefed.

Once the Thunder for is released, and Voyager, Arctic, Summit etc start to support Piefed, then it will be the case.

Has world really not enabled parallel sending yet? That feature was made specifically for them.

I just checked the graph, its now 4.26 days.

Not wanting a meta post is weird though.

Every time I had a mod refusing meta posts it lead to power tripping. Better safe than sorry

Didn’t I with the Mbin post yesterday?

here

4 days delay with aussie.zone https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/40460535

ml

Power tripping admins https://feddit.nl/post/16246531

Zip

Single mod who didn’t want to create a meta posts to ask for more mods.

I studied the situation before starting to post to !fediverse@piefed.social

I told him the same thing about its lemmy repport that i wished something less lemmy centric. :)

With our current situation, it’s just that most of the things are going to happen on Lemmy. New app update? it’s a Lemmy app. New monthly active user milestone reached? Lemmy is probably the main reason.

Hopefully things will get more balanced over time, but we can’t expect a perfect 1/3 split of posts between the three platforms.

not to piefed specifically.

Why not? I’m not saying to move everything, but a few communities to Piefed could be nice. A few to Mbin too to keep everyone happy.

And I’ve used this account for longer, so I don’t want to abandon it.

Probably the main reason why people won’t move to Piefed either

Its written in piefed,

Small lapsus ha ha

Fair point, but mobile apps and inertia seem to outweigh those additional features

It is, but there’s only one way to make Piefed grow, it’s to start getting Piefed communities more active.

Lemmy covers pretty much all the topics the current Threadiverse is interested in, so at some point posters have to accept to post to smaller communities.

I’m not saying everyone has to do it, but as OP states that Piefed is more polished, I was surprised

Those features also impact all Piefed users.

20 people?

https://piefed.fediverse.observer/dailystats&days=7

360 currently, so around 18 times that.

A separate tool could connect to any server federating “Report” activities.

The appetite seems limited as you pointed out yourself in the comment above.

It would be better/faster/easier to simply build a separate tool that can be useful for moderators,

Piefed built it in their software without a separate tool

Two questions for you, I’m genuinely curious, I hope they don’t come up as agressive

• why are you still using your Lemm.ee account instead of Piefed
• why create this post here instead of !fediverse@piefed.social ?

Valid point

• apps
• alternative front ends
• Comments view / chat view

It may be a bit opiniated, but it’s nice to see a different approach from Lemmy devs who don’t see the need for any additional moderation tool.

I brought up mod mail during the AMA, it has been considered too complex to implement. A moderation panel with an overview of the mod queue would be nice too, but not a priority.

I’m not saying Piefed is perfect, but at least they prioritize that aspect.

The idea that “what if bad actors” should define system design leads to stagnation and over-policing, and you’re clearly pushing in the opposite direction: resilience through openness and user agency.

I’m not sure. CSAM attacks happened in the past, it was good to have admins and mods jumping in to block those. In your system a high number of users have to see this type of content for it to be removed

I usually agree with you, but here @troed@fedia.io is right.

Full disclosure

With the full disclosure approach, the full details of the vulnerability are made public as soon as they are identified. This means that the full details (sometimes including exploit code) are available to attackers, often before a patch is available. The full disclosure approach is primarily used in response or organizations ignoring reported vulnerabilities, in order to put pressure on them to develop and publish a fix.

This makes the full disclosure approach very controversial, and it is seen as irresponsible by many people. Generally it should only be considered as a last resort, when all other methods have failed, or when exploit code is already publicly available.

Responsible or Coordinated Disclosure

Responsible disclosure attempts to find a reasonable middle ground between these two approaches. With responsible disclosure, the initial report is made privately, but with the full details being published once a patch has been made available (sometimes with a delay to allow more time for the patches to be installed).

https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Vulnerability_Disclosure_Cheat_Sheet.html#full-disclosure