What I’d like to become the standard is:

If the question makes it super obvious the asker has zero clue what they’re asking or trying to do, lightly correct and steer them to beginner friendly resources.

If the question is competent but focusing the wrong direction or will lead to a bad habit, essentially, they know just enough to be dangerous but they’re about to be dangerous, more pointed and technical correction and steering them to either articles or better search terms to use.

If it’s a pointed question with the information to show they’ve done the normal information gathering and either need opinions that are beyond the theory or book standard information or they don’t answer the question, answer the question. Ideally also giving sources to back up your answers.

Bonus points if you can do the above without coming across as a dick. Unless they ask to ask. You can be a dick to those people.

His work is geared towards introduction to concepts not full lectures.

https://youtu.be/6eC6ITjVf28?si=tNE3IyluWZMy_2Vt

I mean, when you start categorizing things by phylogenetics instead of phenetics, you realize that certain body plans happen a lot more than expected.

Man, you’re not going to like the technicalities of what is and isn’t a penguin…

They grow like someone’s trying to prank others into thinking it’s how they grow.

Yeah but they don’t pull the dopamine like the expensive ones do

I got some 35mm film cause I was playing with the idea of film based astrophotography on my 3d printed telescope and wanted to test out a few different types of film… And since the local places are charging $16+ per roll, was going to develop them myself.

Am I doing this right?

Bruh. 3d printing is a mildly expensive gateway hobby that funnels things into other hobbies

Depends on the flower. Brassicas are generally edible and technically flowers.

Asparagus is just a fern. Idk what pineapple is but it looks fake.

Sunflowers are nice too

Could also be the switch Zelda games