We need a landlord to weigh in on this.
We need a landlord to weigh in on this.
Pretty sure this doesn’t fit the community, but also: ICE won’t shoot you with live ammo when you try to stop them.
Edit: Gaza is a whole different thing, but the IDF in the West Bank is what ICE wants to be.
I won’t dignify this slop with a response. Fucking tankies, man.
I can’t find a way to phrase this that’s not offensive, so I’ll just go ahead: Are you being obtuse or do you just not know what you’re talking about? Because if it’s the latter you should at least take a scroll down this Wikipedia page before you talk about this stuff. However, I will say that sacrificing millions of people for holy communism (which is what happened; the famine was a choice) isn’t much better than sacrificing them for holy property rights. Not asking for foreign aid and denying a famine even existed was also inexcusable.
After the October Revolution of 1917, homosexuality was decriminalised in Soviet Russia with the repeal of the legal code of the Russian Empire, and this decriminalisation was confirmed with new criminal codes in 1922 and 1926. Under Joseph Stalin, the Soviet government reversed course in the late 1920s and promoted harsher policy against LGBTQ rights. In 1933, homosexuality was recriminalised in the Soviet Union, and Article 121, which prohibited male homosexuality, was added to the Soviet penal code in the following year.
You don’t get to blame this on the Nazis.
Yeah… no. Very little in modern history is morally worse than Soviet management of the famine of 1930-1933 (which they caused, too). That shit was at least on par with the Irish Famine in terms of sheer moral depravity.
And this was said about able-bodied parasites such as owners of the means of production, shareholders, landlords, and others living off society on non-labor income.
And Ukrainians, don’t forget Ukrainians. I know enough about early Soviet history to know that Stalin was a cold-blooded murderer. Not that the rest of the Communist Party was full of upstanding global citizens, but Stalin was particularly egregious.
Uh… This is coming from the folks who said “he who does not work, neither shall he eat” during a famine so… uh… yeah, that’s not the flex you think it is.
Edit: And in case anyone is wondering, this gets worse with context.
Man, couldn’t they have missed a little to the west?
That’s probably less legible than you intended it to be.
Here’s another one any action in the middl east always prompts a response from multiple other sources regardless of the territory or regime targeted.
Okay? That’s called solidarity and it’s a good thing last I checked.
Iran itself has spent decades building networks of foreign fighters who would be classed as terrorists.
Based on what criteria?
It’s own soldiers have been caught sponsoring and training these people with the intent to attack and destabilise countries in the west.
Example?
I do not agree with the aggression from Israel or the US but do not ever paint Iran as a saint of a country.
They’re not, but that has nothing to do with your initial claim.
The other person already pointed this out, but resistance against foreign occupation isn’t terrorism no matter how much Western governments want it to be.
The idea is that (so far) it’s America acting alone rather than bringing the whole gang with it like in Iraq.
If you’re not American my claims don’t apply to you (unless you were a non-American peddling anti-Harris online propaganda during the elections, and then you’re as much to blame as the rest of the idiots that did this).
Yes, I was peddling completely non-factual anti-Harris online propaganda about Democrats doing bad things, and you still haven’t engaged with my point.
Resorting to guesses and assumptions so you don’t have to interact with my argument, I see. Well sorry to rain on your parade but, since I’m a non-American who lives on the other side of the world, I had exactly zero role in electing your turd. Now will you stop Trumpwashing your team’s atrocities or are you still digging your head in the sand?
Okay here’s the thing: If the Dem leadership had any problem at all with the situation in Gaza or Iran, they would’ve said something about it. It’s the evil Trump doing it, yet there’s not a goddamn peep from the Schumers and Pelosis of the party about the illegal and immoral war Trump is trying to start. The only conclusion one can make from this is that they’re okay with it, so they’d do similar if not the exact same things if Netanyahu asked nicely. The escalations we’ve seen since the January ceasefire are much better understood in terms of fascist progression and Netanyahu clinging to power.
hat he would give Bibi everything he wanted and make the situation worse was both known from his actions last time and a common warning to “the Dems are just as bad” delusional morons during the campaign, to their protests.
Because genocide Joe didn’t give him everything he wanted? I’ve seen Biden parrot the 40 dead babies nonsense, don’t try to gaslight me into believing he wasn’t Netanyahu’s bitch.
I hear you, the issue for me is that a third of your country people voted for the cunt, another third didn’t care enough not to vote against the cunt,
Okay I don’t think bombing Iran is a partisan issue in America. It’s more like a third supports this, half doesn’t care enough to act and the remaining sixth is too busy convincing itself that genocide is good if it’s the lesser evil. The guilt for this crosses party lines by a fair bit. I mean hell, the only vocal opposition to this is coming from people like MTG and Tucker Carlson, not anyone from the Dem political establishment.
Kinda wanna embrace our AI overlords ngl.
I mean Tucker Carlson has exactly one good idea: not going to war with Iran.
And we will never think of or hear about this guy ever again.
Of the first successful 21st century fascist? No way. Give it a few decades and you’ll start getting neo-MAGAs.
Not that I disagree, but username checks out.