I am trying to focus on posting source documents, as opposed to someone else’s reporting on source documents.

  • 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle









  • Nougat@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldThe line's back there
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the lane being used is still open for forward traffic, that is a completely legitimate zipper merge, although it would be safer to match speed more gradually and, of course, wait for an appropriate space to merge into. As a hypothetical, that’s a borderline case, and it’s certainly possible to adjust the details of the hypothetical to make the merging driver into the dick. But I’m not sure that’s a useful pursuit.




  • Nougat@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldThe line's back there
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’re talking about two different things then. Open road, light fast-moving traffic, lane ending - the “merge zone” lengthens with that speed and space.

    Heavy slow-moving traffic, lane ending, use the lanes which are available and zipper merge at the end. Merging too soon in this situation does create congestion.




  • Nougat@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldThe line's back there
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you mean “rush to zipper” as in “using an open lane to move forward and then zipper merge into the remaining lane when that one closes?” That is precisely what you should do.

    The problem is the selfish people who refuse to let those people actually zipper merge, like OP.