That’s where the DEATH BREATHERS live

Bro why u gotta bring up Nicole! /s

There’s a butterfly meme to make here, not sure if it should be aimed at the scammer or the reposts

Someone made this if it makes you feel better.

He just drumming up his nazi base who have no idea of the multiple levels of irony.

They’re just looking for the question.

This post does not say jury nullification shouldn’t exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.

Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does no apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It’s not even a law, it’s the result of the fact juries can’t be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can “nullify the law”. That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

Saying the law doesn’t actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn’t be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery except for very very special cases.

This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror.

I think leaving gulf of mexico is ok

Try to find some that are made properly.

deleted by creator

Insecurity. “Males” is a pretty wide brush in this case

Why am i not surprised to immediately find garbage like “genocide Joe” in your post history.

You couldn’t even formulate an argument. Thanks for making it obvious why to block

I think everyone is good with EV subsidies, just not those for companies whose executives have conflicts of interests as they act as government officials overseeing the spending.

Martial law remained in effect until it was officially lifted on January 11, 1990. They stayed there and kept harassing people. They didnt leave the city, these tanks were not going home and tankman wasn’t trying to keep them there. His source doesn’t even say what he says it says.

Wiki

Removed by mod

We sneer at it too, but here it’s built into people’s wages. If i could vote to abolish it i would

Well yeah, if you dont declare all your income to dodge taxes, they shouldn’t be surprised the income can’t be used for credit. But if it’s just cash then it’s not traceable, you can declare less and keep more in your pocket than an electronic transaction

It also depends how the company declares their outgoing tips and contributions (different in US vs canada of even states/provinces).

Removed by mod

Thats europe. In north america, waiters are paid below minimum wage and the tips are supposed to make up the rest.

15% i think is still what the gov expects for wages, so in theory thats for just plain service, forcing us to either hurt the waiter or pay the fee. It’s a terrible system. I prefer to not eat out at all than to cut tips, even for poor service i’ll leave 10% and won’t go back.