I haven’t seen a single browser that didn’t support webp

… They mean that you’re supporting free speech by disabling and block and supporting them

This isn’t a court trial tbh

So just because it’s not a court trial means we should throw out innocent until proven guilty? The burden of proof is non-negotiable. These ideas have existed for centuries, they aren’t a purely legal framework.

what has come forth from Madison’s side

Which is, to be perfectly fair, limited to he-said-she-said which isn’t evidence. It’s just an allegation and very little can be decided from that alone.

At this point there is exactly zero useful information to actually derive any real decision from.

I think this underestimates how users will naturally gravitate towards more centralized instances, or they’ll give up because the bigger instances are closed. Someone’s gotta pay for it, and it’s going to cost more than a Netflix subscription. Servers aren’t cheap.

This also ignores that the system isn’t horizontally scalable at all, so scaling up gets even more expensive