• 0 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2024

help-circle
  • If you’re happy with your life, that’s perfect!

    As people are usually social creatures, it’s only natural if someone is in truth not happy about this. There are exceptions of course.

    However, my comment was totally misplaced and condescending. My bad. Didn’t think much about it. I’m truly sorry about this.

    I’ve deleted the comment.


  • You’re right. I’m sorry. I was just joking, but it’s not okay to do that by picking on someone who lives a harmless life.

    I guess I felt a bit offended, since he sounded rather aggressive and condescending. But, not my business. Doesn’t affect me nor anyone else besides himself alone.

    Thanks for pointing that out. I’ve deleted my comment.




  • Zacryon@feddit.orgtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIntruder
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    but beyond that whatever means necessary to protect himself is justified. No one should be worrying about the safety of their attacker when they are defending themselves

    Are burglars usually murderers? Don’t they usually care about stealing stuff to make some form of profit out of that?

    I don’t share your view. You don’t need to kill someone in order to stop some form of crime. Especially not if there is no or a low risk of bodily harm.

    Self defence only goes so far as to inrerrupt and disable an attack. The mildest means possible are the preferrable ones. For example, if some wants to beat you up, you don’t go on and kill them after you’ve defeated them and they’re unconscious on the ground.
    In this case, the best the kid could’ve done is to just run away and call for help. It would’ve been safer for himself and prevented that he possibly might have become a murderer.

    Self defence has limits. And for good reason. You can’t just do anything you want, just because someone attacks you. You do what is necessary and possible for you. Nothing more, nothing less. Otherwise you yourself become a culprit.


  • Zacryon@feddit.orgtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIntruder
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    you broke into my house dude you aren’t gonna be praised

    Of course not.

    This kid has every right to be proud, in this situation we are nothing but animals and he did exactly the right thing.

    So is it right to put deadly weapons into the hands of children?
    What if he had killed the burglar? Good thing to have on the conscience of a child, right?

    Don’t get me wrong. I totally understand that in extreme situations people should defend themselves. But was this an extreme situation which justifies these actions?

    What the child said is already deeply disturbing:

    “I told him I was going to kill him if he didn’t get out of my house,” said Chris.

    And why the fuck do children have access to weapons?

    he grabbed a 9mm handgun

    Then there is this:

    The intruder made it out the front door, but that’s when Chris started firing off bullets. As the intruder was about to jump a fence, Chris’s 12th and final shot hit the bad guy in the leg.

    ( Citations from: https://www.wptv.com/news/national/chris-gaither-11-year-old-boy-shoots-intruder-who-cried-like-a-baby )

    Intruder was outside, going away, and the kid started shooting.
    The kid could’ve just ran away. Instead of trying to kill someone or getting themselves killed by such a behaviour.

    No. The kid shouldn’t be proud. Neither should anyone. That’s just fucked up. And raising kids to become possibly killers is not making it better overall.
    He can be lucky not to have killed that man and that he (the kid) didn’t get seriously injured.

    People can and should be better than this.


  • Zacryon@feddit.orgtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIntruder
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    and you’re naive if you don’t think violence is a potential outcome

    Currently, of course. Point is, people can be better. On both sides. And instead of nurturing our compassion and collective support, we praise violence and let continue the wheel to roll which has already destroyed countless of lives.










  • The level of your argumentation:
    Are you a firefighter or a medical doctor? If not, you’re obviously in favour of fires, death and disease.
    Why aren’t you donating all of your stuff to homeless people? Or are you happy all those people don’t have a home?
    Why aren’t you saving the world already???

    You know, demanding change and maybe showing some sort of protest does not mean you need to do those things exactly as you would like to see them, especially if those efforts wouldn’t change anything on the larger scale and rather lead to a bunch of problems in your life.




  • The position with the vegan cats is basically indefensible.

    What do all organisms, including animals, need to properly maintain their metabolism?
    Nutrients.
    What are nutrients?
    A bunch of different chemicals.

    Depending on the specific organism, another set of nutrients is required, also varying in amount of course.

    All required nutrients for humans at least can be obtained or synthesized from non-animal compounds.

    From that simplified perspective, it’s absolutely rational to explore how we could feed animals like cats on a purely vegan diet.
    But it’s certainly nothing which should be left to do for the layman alone, as veterinarian care is advisable if harming the animal should be avoided.